Natural Gas Services Group (NGS) vs Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Natural Gas Services Group (NGS) has outperformed Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) over the past year, gaining 19.6% versus a gain of 18.5%. Over five years, NGS leads with a +164.4% price change compared with -18.3% for TUSK. Natural Gas Services Group is the larger company by market cap ($431.8 million vs $134.8 million), about 3.2 times the size.
Natural Gas Services Group pays a dividend yielding 1.40%, while Mammoth Energy Services does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NGS | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $33.48 | $2.80 |
| Market cap | $431.77M | $134.76M |
| 1-day change | +0.89% | +1.45% |
| YTD return | -1.40% | +49.19% |
| 1-year return | +19.61% | +18.45% |
| 5-year return | +164.38% | -18.34% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 20.79 | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.83 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.61 | $-0.44 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.47 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $44.61 | $3.92 |
| 52-week low | $25.53 | $1.72 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -24.96% | -28.57% |
| Analyst consensus | none | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +67.29% | — |
| Average volume | 120.58K | 156.50K |
| Shares outstanding | 12.90M | 48.13M |
| Employees | 259 | 115 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oilfield Services/Equipment | Oilfield Services/Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Natural Gas Services Group is about 3.2 times larger than Mammoth Energy Services by market value ($431.77M vs $134.76M).
- Natural Gas Services Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.40% vs 0.00%).
About Natural Gas Services Group
NGS stock →Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. provides natural gas compression equipment, flares and related assets; and electric compression equipment, technology and services to the energy industry in the United States.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 259 employees
About Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK stock →Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. operates as an energy services company in the United States, Canada, and internationally.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 115 employees
NGS vs TUSK FAQ
Which is bigger, Natural Gas Services Group or Mammoth Energy Services?
Natural Gas Services Group (NGS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $431.77M compared with $134.76M for Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NGS or TUSK?
NGS returned +19.61% over the past 12 months, compared with +18.45% for TUSK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Natural Gas Services Group or Mammoth Energy Services?
Natural Gas Services Group pays a dividend yielding 1.40%, while Mammoth Energy Services does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Natural Gas Services Group and Mammoth Energy Services in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry within the Energy sector.