North American Construction Group (NOA) vs Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) has outperformed North American Construction Group (NOA) over the past year, gaining 18.5% versus a loss of 18.6%. Over five years, TUSK leads with a -18.3% price change compared with -26.3% for NOA. North American Construction Group is the larger company by market cap ($319.7 million vs $132.8 million), about 2.4 times the size.
North American Construction Group pays a dividend yielding 4.04%, while Mammoth Energy Services does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NOA | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $11.88 | $2.76 |
| Market cap | $319.74M | $132.83M |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | -2.99% |
| YTD return | -17.33% | +49.19% |
| 1-year return | -18.57% | +18.45% |
| 5-year return | -26.35% | -18.34% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.67 | — |
| Forward P/E | 6.88 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.81 | $-0.44 |
| Dividend yield | 4.04% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $17.26 | $3.92 |
| 52-week low | $11.72 | $1.72 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.17% | -29.59% |
| Analyst consensus | none | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +121.13% | — |
| Average volume | 97.97K | 156.50K |
| Shares outstanding | 26.91M | 48.13M |
| Employees | 693 | 115 |
| Sector | Energy | Industrials |
| Industry | Oilfield Services/Equipment | Conglomerates |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- North American Construction Group is about 2.4 times larger than Mammoth Energy Services by market value ($319.74M vs $132.83M).
- TUSK has outperformed NOA by 37.0 percentage points over the past year.
- North American Construction Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.04% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: North American Construction Group in Energy and Mammoth Energy Services in Industrials.
About North American Construction Group
NOA stock →North American Construction Group Ltd. provides mining and heavy civil construction services to customers in the resource development and industrial construction sectors in Australia, Canada, and the United States.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 693 employees
About Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK stock →Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. operates as an energy services company in the United States, Canada, and internationally.
Industrials · Conglomerates · 115 employees
NOA vs TUSK FAQ
Which is bigger, North American Construction Group or Mammoth Energy Services?
North American Construction Group (NOA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $319.74M compared with $132.83M for Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NOA or TUSK?
TUSK returned +18.45% over the past 12 months, compared with -18.57% for NOA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, North American Construction Group or Mammoth Energy Services?
North American Construction Group pays a dividend yielding 4.04%, while Mammoth Energy Services does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are North American Construction Group and Mammoth Energy Services in the same industry?
No. North American Construction Group is in the Energy sector, while Mammoth Energy Services is in Industrials.