NIO (NIO) vs Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) has outperformed NIO (NIO) over the past year, losing 1.4% versus a loss of 53.6%. Over five years, OSK leads with a +26.5% price change compared with -90.8% for NIO. NIO is the larger company by market cap ($8.54 billion vs $7.86 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 26.8x for NIO). Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while NIO does not currently pay one. Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.2% versus -17.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NIO | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $3.41 | $127.35 |
| Market cap | $8.54B | $7.86B |
| 1-day change | -3.67% | -0.98% |
| YTD return | -31.76% | +2.37% |
| 1-year return | -53.60% | -1.42% |
| 5-year return | -90.77% | +26.51% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 14.59 |
| Forward P/E | 26.85 | 9.05 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.25 | $8.73 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.70% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $2.16 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.51B | $10.42B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +38.93% | -2.87% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-2.14B | $647.00M |
| Gross margin | 13.62% | 17.45% |
| Operating margin | -16.05% | 9.01% |
| Net margin | -17.08% | 6.21% |
| 52-week high | $7.80 | $180.49 |
| 52-week low | $3.36 | $116.77 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -56.28% | -29.44% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +85.04% | +31.51% |
| Average volume | 30.53M | 711.76K |
| Shares outstanding | 2.36B | 61.74M |
| Employees | 35,032 | 18,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Auto Manufacturing | Auto Manufacturing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- OSK has outperformed NIO by 52.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.00%).
- Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock is more profitable, keeping 6.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -17.1 cents for NIO.
- NIO grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+38.93% vs -2.87%).
About NIO
NIO stock →NIO Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells smart electric vehicles in China, Europe, and internationally.
Industrials · Auto Manufacturing · 35,032 employees
About Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock
OSK stock →Oshkosh Corporation provides purpose-built vehicles and equipment worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Access, Vocational, and Transport segment.
Industrials · Auto Manufacturing · 18,000 employees
NIO vs OSK FAQ
Which is bigger, NIO or Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock?
NIO (NIO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.54B compared with $7.86B for Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NIO or OSK?
OSK returned -1.42% over the past 12 months, compared with -53.60% for NIO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, NIO or Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock?
Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while NIO does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are NIO and Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Manufacturing industry within the Industrials sector.