Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) vs XPeng (XPEV)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) has outperformed XPeng (XPEV) over the past year, losing 5.4% versus a loss of 60.5%. Over five years, OSK leads with a +25.3% price change compared with -77.7% for XPEV. XPeng is the larger company by market cap ($9.15 billion vs $7.86 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 51.8x for XPeng). Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while XPeng does not currently pay one. Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.2% versus -46.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | OSK | XPEV |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $127.35 | $9.55 |
| Market cap | $7.86B | $9.15B |
| 1-day change | -0.98% | -0.31% |
| YTD return | +1.37% | -52.91% |
| 1-year return | -5.37% | -60.52% |
| 5-year return | +25.27% | -77.68% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.59 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.05 | 51.85 |
| EPS (TTM) | $8.73 | $-0.47 |
| Dividend yield | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $2.16 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $10.42B | $895.68M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.87% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $647.00M | $-418.70M |
| Gross margin | 17.45% | 4.55% |
| Operating margin | 9.01% | -73.47% |
| Net margin | 6.21% | -46.75% |
| 52-week high | $180.49 | $28.24 |
| 52-week low | $116.77 | $9.18 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.44% | -66.18% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +31.51% | +92.77% |
| Average volume | 711.65K | 6.93M |
| Shares outstanding | 61.74M | 783.62M |
| Employees | 18,000 | 20,632 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Auto Manufacturing | Auto Manufacturing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- OSK has outperformed XPEV by 55.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.00%).
- Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock is more profitable, keeping 6.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -46.7 cents for XPeng.
About Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock
OSK stock →Oshkosh Corporation provides purpose-built vehicles and equipment worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Access, Vocational, and Transport segment.
Industrials · Auto Manufacturing · 18,000 employees
About XPeng
XPEV stock →XPeng Inc. operates as a physical AI company.
Industrials · Auto Manufacturing · 20,632 employees
OSK vs XPEV FAQ
Which is bigger, Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock or XPeng?
XPeng (XPEV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.15B compared with $7.86B for Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, OSK or XPEV?
OSK returned -5.37% over the past 12 months, compared with -60.52% for XPEV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock or XPeng?
Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while XPeng does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock and XPeng in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Manufacturing industry within the Industrials sector.