MetaCap

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) vs John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.7x vs 8.4x for Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund). John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund pays a dividend yielding 8.33%, while Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

NMS versus PDT key metrics
MetricNMSPDT
Share price$9.74$11.89
Market cap$62.43M—
1-day change0.00%+0.76%
P/E ratio (TTM)8.404.66
EPS (TTM)$1.16$2.55
Dividend yield7.76%8.33%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.99
52-week high$12.50$13.65
52-week low$9.48$11.56
Distance from 52-week high-22.08%-12.89%
Average volume33.12K129.15K
Shares outstanding6.41M—
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance CompaniesFinance Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.4x vs 4.7x trailing P/E).

NMS vs PDT FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, NMS or PDT?

PDT has the lower trailing P/E at 4.7, versus 8.4 for NMS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund or John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund?

John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund has the higher yield at 8.33%, compared with 7.76% for Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund.

Are Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance Companies industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons