Neostellar Capital (NSLR) vs TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG) has outperformed Neostellar Capital (NSLR) over the past year, losing 16.2% versus a loss of 24.6%. Over five years, NSLR leads with a -42.6% price change compared with -72.2% for TPVG. Neostellar Capital is the larger company by market cap ($193.5 million vs $188.7 million), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Neostellar Capital trades at a lower trailing P/E (1.8x vs 4.7x for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays a dividend yielding 19.85%, while Neostellar Capital does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NSLR | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $7.31 | $4.64 |
| Market cap | $193.52M | $188.69M |
| 1-day change | -1.22% | -0.75% |
| YTD return | -21.61% | -28.59% |
| 1-year return | -24.64% | -16.16% |
| 5-year return | -42.59% | -72.22% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 4.68 |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.65 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.15 | $0.99 |
| Dividend yield | 3.38% | 19.85% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.92 |
| 52-week high | $14.98 | $6.95 |
| 52-week low | $7.04 | $4.40 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -51.20% | -33.31% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +118.06% | +25.78% |
| Average volume | 341.40K | 227.46K |
| Shares outstanding | 26.47M | 40.71M |
| Employees | 9 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Other Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC trades at a higher earnings multiple (4.7x vs 1.8x trailing P/E).
- TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (19.85% vs 3.38%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Neostellar Capital in Finance and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC in Consumer Discretionary.
About Neostellar Capital
NSLR stock →Neostellar Capital Corp., formerly known as SuRo Capital Corp. is a venture capital, mezzanine, secondary(direct) and business development company specializing in growth capital, emerging growth, late stage and venture capital-backed private companies.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 9 employees
About TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
TPVG stock →TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is a business development company specializing investments in venture capital-backed companies at the growth stage investments.
Consumer Discretionary · Other Consumer Services
NSLR vs TPVG FAQ
Which is bigger, Neostellar Capital or TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC?
Neostellar Capital (NSLR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $193.52M compared with $188.69M for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NSLR or TPVG?
TPVG returned -16.16% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.64% for NSLR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, NSLR or TPVG?
NSLR has the lower trailing P/E at 1.8, versus 4.7 for TPVG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Neostellar Capital or TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has the higher yield at 19.85%, compared with 3.38% for Neostellar Capital.
Are Neostellar Capital and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC in the same industry?
No. Neostellar Capital is in the Finance sector, while TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is in Consumer Discretionary.