MetaCap

Universal Display (OLED) vs Sanmina (SANM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Sanmina (SANM) has outperformed Universal Display (OLED) over the past year, gaining 74.7% versus a loss of 45.0%. Over five years, SANM leads with a +455.2% price change compared with -56.3% for OLED. Sanmina is the larger company by market cap ($11.76 billion vs $3.55 billion), about 3.3 times the size.

On valuation, Sanmina trades at a lower forward P/E (15.8x vs 16.2x for Universal Display). Universal Display pays a dividend yielding 2.46%, while Sanmina does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

OLED-45.00%SANM+74.66%
+134%+39%-56%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
OLED-54.31%SANM+455.33%
+588%+252%-85%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

OLED versus SANM key metrics
MetricOLEDSANM
Share price$77.22$219.41
Market cap$3.55B$11.76B
1-day change-3.06%-3.80%
YTD return-33.88%+46.21%
1-year return-45.00%+74.66%
5-year return-56.33%+455.19%
P/E ratio (TTM)18.6540.78
Forward P/E16.2215.77
EPS (TTM)$4.14$5.38
Dividend yield2.46%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.90$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)—$8.13B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+7.40%
Net income (latest FY)—$245.89M
Gross margin—8.81%
Operating margin—4.36%
Net margin—3.03%
52-week high$153.38$288.68
52-week low$73.23$118.10
Distance from 52-week high-49.65%-24.00%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+49.40%+18.50%
Average volume736.38K682.55K
Shares outstanding45.97M53.60M
Employees46935,000
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectrical ProductsElectrical Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Sanmina is about 3.3 times larger than Universal Display by market value ($11.76B vs $3.55B).
  • SANM has outperformed OLED by 119.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Sanmina trades at a higher earnings multiple (40.8x vs 18.7x trailing P/E).
  • Universal Display offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.46% vs 0.00%).

About Universal Display

OLED stock →

Universal Display Corporation engages in the research, development, and commercialization of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials for use in display and solid-state lighting applications. It offers phosphorescent organic light-emitting diode (PHOLED) technologies and materials for displays and lighting products under the UniversalPHOLED brand.

Technology · Electrical Products · 469 employees

About Sanmina

SANM stock →

Sanmina Corporation provides integrated manufacturing solutions, components, products and repair, logistics, and after-market services in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company operates through two businesses: Integrated Manufacturing Solutions; and Components, Products and Services.

Technology · Electrical Products · 35,000 employees

OLED vs SANM FAQ

Which is bigger, Universal Display or Sanmina?

Sanmina (SANM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.76B compared with $3.55B for Universal Display (OLED).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, OLED or SANM?

SANM returned +74.66% over the past 12 months, compared with -45.00% for OLED (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, OLED or SANM?

OLED has the lower trailing P/E at 18.7, versus 40.8 for SANM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Universal Display or Sanmina?

Universal Display pays a dividend yielding 2.46%, while Sanmina does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Universal Display and Sanmina in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons