MetaCap

Onto Innovation (ONTO) vs Regal Rexnord (RRX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 21, 2026.

Summary

Onto Innovation (ONTO) has outperformed Regal Rexnord (RRX) over the past year, gaining 65.4% versus a gain of 8.1%. Over five years, ONTO leads with a +180.4% price change compared with +4.2% for RRX. Onto Innovation is the larger company by market cap ($10.90 billion vs $10.57 billion), about 1.0 times the size.

On valuation, Regal Rexnord trades at a lower forward P/E (12.3x vs 19.0x for Onto Innovation). Regal Rexnord pays a dividend yielding 0.88%, while Onto Innovation does not currently pay one. Onto Innovation converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.6% versus 4.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ONTO+65.38%RRX+8.07%
+191%+85%-22%
Oct 21, 20251 yearOct 21, 2026
ONTO+198.78%RRX+5.68%
+368%+157%-54%
Oct 18, 20215 yearsOct 19, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ONTO versus RRX key metrics
MetricONTORRX
Share price$222.14$158.78
Market cap$10.90B$10.57B
1-day change+1.15%+1.76%
YTD return+40.72%+13.16%
1-year return+65.38%+8.07%
5-year return+180.44%+4.23%
P/E ratio (TTM)82.5832.08
Forward P/E18.9912.29
EPS (TTM)$2.69$4.95
Dividend yield0.00%0.88%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.40
Revenue (latest FY)$1.01B$5.93B
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.82%-1.65%
Net income (latest FY)$136.76M$279.50M
Gross margin49.72%37.37%
Operating margin13.22%11.47%
Net margin13.60%4.71%
52-week high$386.46$247.80
52-week low$118.97$127.96
Distance from 52-week high-42.52%-35.92%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+74.44%+45.55%
Average volume1.02M1.22M
Shares outstanding49.07M66.57M
Employees1,86728,700
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ONTO has outperformed RRX by 57.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Onto Innovation trades at a higher earnings multiple (82.6x vs 32.1x trailing P/E).
  • Onto Innovation is more profitable, keeping 13.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 4.7 cents for Regal Rexnord.

About Onto Innovation

ONTO stock →

Onto Innovation Inc. engages in the design, development, manufacture, and support of process control tools that perform macro-defect inspection and metrology in the United States, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, China, Southeast Asia, Asia, and Europe.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 1,867 employees

About Regal Rexnord

RRX stock →

Regal Rexnord Corporation provides sustainable solutions for power, transmit, and control motion products in the North America, Asia, Europe, and internationally. The company operates through Automation & Motion Control, Industrial Powertrain Solutions, and Power Efficiency Solutions.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 28,700 employees

ONTO vs RRX FAQ

Which is bigger, Onto Innovation or Regal Rexnord?

Onto Innovation (ONTO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.90B compared with $10.57B for Regal Rexnord (RRX).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ONTO or RRX?

ONTO returned +65.38% over the past 12 months, compared with +8.07% for RRX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ONTO or RRX?

RRX has the lower trailing P/E at 32.1, versus 82.6 for ONTO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Onto Innovation or Regal Rexnord?

Regal Rexnord pays a dividend yielding 0.88%, while Onto Innovation does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Onto Innovation and Regal Rexnord in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons