Opera (OPRA) vs Quantum Computing (QUBT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Opera (OPRA) has outperformed Quantum Computing (QUBT) over the past year, losing 0.3% versus a loss of 64.2%. Over five years, OPRA leads with a +87.7% price change compared with +29.8% for QUBT. Quantum Computing is the larger company by market cap ($1.68 billion vs $1.56 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
Opera pays a dividend yielding 6.83%, while Quantum Computing does not currently pay one. Opera converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 17.6% versus -2738.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | OPRA | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $17.58 | $7.44 |
| Market cap | $1.56B | $1.68B |
| 1-day change | +4.39% | -0.13% |
| YTD return | +18.93% | -27.39% |
| 1-year return | -0.30% | -64.22% |
| 5-year return | +87.74% | +29.79% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.65 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.83 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.39 | $-0.05 |
| Dividend yield | 6.83% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.20 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $614.83M | $682.00K |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +27.92% | +82.84% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $108.28M | $-18.67M |
| Gross margin | — | 9.82% |
| Operating margin | 14.65% | -7489.30% |
| Net margin | 17.61% | -2738.12% |
| 52-week high | $20.78 | $23.79 |
| 52-week low | $11.71 | $6.18 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.40% | -68.73% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +49.54% | +150.94% |
| Average volume | 345.25K | 7.79M |
| Shares outstanding | 88.92M | 226.35M |
| Employees | 605 | 72 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- OPRA has outperformed QUBT by 63.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Opera offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.83% vs 0.00%).
- Opera is more profitable, keeping 17.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2738.1 cents for Quantum Computing.
- Quantum Computing grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+82.84% vs +27.92%).
About Opera
OPRA stock →Opera Limited, together with its subsidiaries, provides mobile and PC web browsers and related products and services in Ireland, Singapore, the United States, and internationally. The company offers specialized browsers, including Opera One browser, Opera AI, Opera GX; Opera Neon, a subscription-based agentic AI browser designed for productivity-oriented users; and offers Web3 and e-commerce services.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 605 employees
About Quantum Computing
QUBT stock →Quantum Computing Inc., an integrated photonics company, provides quantum machines to commercial and government markets in the United States. The company develops thin-film lithium niobate chips for optical devices, such as electro-optical modulators, periodically poled devices for frequency conversion, and micro-ring resonator cavities markets.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 72 employees
OPRA vs QUBT FAQ
Which is bigger, Opera or Quantum Computing?
Quantum Computing (QUBT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.68B compared with $1.56B for Opera (OPRA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, OPRA or QUBT?
OPRA returned -0.30% over the past 12 months, compared with -64.22% for QUBT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Opera or Quantum Computing?
Opera pays a dividend yielding 6.83%, while Quantum Computing does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Opera and Quantum Computing in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry within the Technology sector.