MetaCap

PagSeguro Digital (PAGS) vs Tenable (TENB)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Tenable (TENB) has outperformed PagSeguro Digital (PAGS) over the past year, gaining 30.5% versus a gain of 14.3%. Over five years, TENB leads with a -23.3% price change compared with -71.4% for PAGS. Tenable is the larger company by market cap ($4.30 billion vs $2.94 billion), about 1.5 times the size.

On valuation, PagSeguro Digital trades at a lower forward P/E (5.6x vs 17.9x for Tenable). PagSeguro Digital pays a dividend yielding 12.69%, while Tenable does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

PAGS+14.35%TENB+30.47%
+47%-2%-51%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
PAGS-70.80%TENB-19.27%
+32%-28%-88%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

PAGS versus TENB key metrics
MetricPAGSTENB
Share price$10.68$39.01
Market cap$2.94B$4.30B
1-day change+1.62%+0.18%
YTD return+10.79%+65.79%
1-year return+14.35%+30.47%
5-year return-71.36%-23.28%
P/E ratio (TTM)7.52650.17
Forward P/E5.6017.89
EPS (TTM)$1.42$0.06
Dividend yield12.69%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.36$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)—$999.40M
Revenue growth (YoY)—+11.04%
Net income (latest FY)—$-36.12M
Gross margin—78.09%
Operating margin—-0.92%
Net margin—-3.61%
52-week high$12.32$43.67
52-week low$8.42$15.73
Distance from 52-week high-13.31%-10.67%
Analyst consensusbuyhold
Avg. price target upside+8.99%-9.38%
Average volume3.30M4.06M
Shares outstanding155.19M110.14M
Employees—1,995
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • TENB has outperformed PAGS by 16.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Tenable trades at a higher earnings multiple (650.2x vs 7.5x trailing P/E).
  • PagSeguro Digital offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (12.69% vs 0.00%).

About PagSeguro Digital

PAGS stock →

PagSeguro Digital Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides financial and payment solutions for consumers, individual entrepreneurs, micro-merchants, and small and medium-sized companies in Brazil and internationally. The company provides digital banking solutions, including bill payments, deposits, top-ups, debt management, direct deposits, pix, tax collections, tax collections, wire transfer, and ATM withdrawal; cards, such as debit, credit, cash, and prepaid cards; and credit products comprising FGTS withdrawals, payroll loans, working capital loans, and overdraft accounts.

Technology · Software - Infrastructure

About Tenable

TENB stock →

Tenable Holdings, Inc. provides cyber exposure management solutions in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and Japan.

Technology · Software - Infrastructure · 1,995 employees

PAGS vs TENB FAQ

Which is bigger, PagSeguro Digital or Tenable?

Tenable (TENB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.30B compared with $2.94B for PagSeguro Digital (PAGS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, PAGS or TENB?

TENB returned +30.47% over the past 12 months, compared with +14.35% for PAGS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, PAGS or TENB?

PAGS has the lower trailing P/E at 7.5, versus 650.2 for TENB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, PagSeguro Digital or Tenable?

PagSeguro Digital pays a dividend yielding 12.69%, while Tenable does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are PagSeguro Digital and Tenable in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons