Payoneer Global (PAYO) vs TriNet Group (TNET)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Payoneer Global (PAYO) has outperformed TriNet Group (TNET) over the past year, gaining 17.2% versus a loss of 0.4%. Over five years, PAYO leads with a -15.2% price change compared with -34.7% for TNET. TriNet Group is the larger company by market cap ($3.05 billion vs $2.43 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Payoneer Global is growing revenue faster (+7.7% vs -0.9%).
On valuation, TriNet Group trades at a lower forward P/E (13.5x vs 15.6x for Payoneer Global). TriNet Group pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while Payoneer Global does not currently pay one. Payoneer Global converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.0% versus 3.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PAYO | TNET |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $7.16 | $66.49 |
| Market cap | $2.43B | $3.05B |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | +3.17% |
| YTD return | +27.40% | +9.00% |
| 1-year return | +17.18% | -0.37% |
| 5-year return | -15.17% | -34.70% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 51.14 | 17.68 |
| Forward P/E | 15.56 | 13.51 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.14 | $3.76 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.70% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.13 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.05B | $5.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.68% | -0.85% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $73.19M | $155.00M |
| Operating margin | 11.84% | — |
| Net margin | 6.95% | 3.09% |
| 52-week high | $7.19 | $73.08 |
| 52-week low | $4.08 | $33.61 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.42% | -9.02% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +3.35% | -0.44% |
| Average volume | 3.54M | 360.51K |
| Shares outstanding | 338.85M | 45.90M |
| Employees | 2,540 | 302,955 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PAYO has outperformed TNET by 17.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Payoneer Global trades at a higher earnings multiple (51.1x vs 17.7x trailing P/E).
- TriNet Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.00%).
- Payoneer Global grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.68% vs -0.85%).
About Payoneer Global
PAYO stock →Payoneer Global Inc. operates as a financial technology company.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 2,540 employees
About TriNet Group
TNET stock →TriNet Group, Inc. provides comprehensive human capital management services for small and medium-sized businesses in the United States.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 302,955 employees
PAYO vs TNET FAQ
Which is bigger, Payoneer Global or TriNet Group?
TriNet Group (TNET) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.05B compared with $2.43B for Payoneer Global (PAYO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PAYO or TNET?
PAYO returned +17.18% over the past 12 months, compared with -0.37% for TNET (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PAYO or TNET?
TNET has the lower trailing P/E at 17.7, versus 51.1 for PAYO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Payoneer Global or TriNet Group?
TriNet Group pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while Payoneer Global does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Payoneer Global and TriNet Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.