PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) vs Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has outperformed PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) over the past year, losing 9.8% versus a loss of 28.0%. Over five years, RQI leads with a -29.9% price change compared with -46.7% for PDI. PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund is the larger company by market cap ($6.88 billion vs $1.51 billion), about 4.6 times the size.
On valuation, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (6.9x vs 10.3x for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund). Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund pays a dividend yielding 9.09%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PDI | RQI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.43 | $11.23 |
| Market cap | $6.88B | $1.51B |
| 1-day change | +0.66% | +0.94% |
| YTD return | -19.09% | -2.63% |
| 1-year return | -28.03% | -9.81% |
| 5-year return | -46.73% | -29.93% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.30 | 6.89 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.40 | $1.63 |
| Dividend yield | 18.46% | 9.09% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.02 |
| 52-week high | $19.93 | $13.57 |
| 52-week low | $13.73 | $10.81 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -27.62% | -17.28% |
| Average volume | 3.73M | 688.78K |
| Shares outstanding | 476.62M | 134.52M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund is about 4.6 times larger than Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund by market value ($6.88B vs $1.51B).
- RQI has outperformed PDI by 18.2 percentage points over the past year.
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (10.3x vs 6.9x trailing P/E).
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (18.46% vs 9.09%).
About PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
PDI stock →PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund is a close ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC. It is co-managed by Pacific Investment Management Company LLC.
Finance · Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable
About Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
RQI stock →Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by Cohen & Steers, Inc.
Finance · Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable
PDI vs RQI FAQ
Which is bigger, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund or Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund?
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.88B compared with $1.51B for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PDI or RQI?
RQI returned -9.81% over the past 12 months, compared with -28.03% for PDI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PDI or RQI?
RQI has the lower trailing P/E at 6.9, versus 10.3 for PDI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund or Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund?
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund has the higher yield at 18.46%, compared with 9.09% for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund.
Are PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable industry within the Finance sector.