MetaCap

Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund (PGP) vs Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (UTF)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.7x vs 5.4x for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund). Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (10.06% vs 7.46%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

PGP versus UTF key metrics
MetricPGPUTF
Share price$8.23$25.35
Market cap$95.40M—
1-day change-1.56%-0.98%
P/E ratio (TTM)4.685.37
EPS (TTM)$1.76$4.72
Dividend yield10.06%7.46%
Annual dividend$0.828$1.89
52-week high$9.41$28.11
52-week low$8.04$23.42
Distance from 52-week high-12.54%-9.82%
Average volume56.92K301.70K
Shares outstanding11.59M—
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance CompaniesFinance Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.06% vs 7.46%).

PGP vs UTF FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, PGP or UTF?

PGP has the lower trailing P/E at 4.7, versus 5.4 for UTF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund or Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund?

Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund has the higher yield at 10.06%, compared with 7.46% for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund.

Are Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance Companies industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons