Progressive (PGR) vs Travelers Companies (TRV)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Travelers Companies (TRV) has outperformed Progressive (PGR) over the past year, gaining 26.5% versus a loss of 12.2%. Over five years, PGR leads with a +134.7% price change compared with +131.7% for TRV. Progressive is the larger company by market cap ($124.28 billion vs $75.21 billion), about 1.7 times the size.
On valuation, Travelers Companies trades at a lower forward P/E (11.9x vs 13.1x for Progressive). Travelers Companies offers the higher dividend yield (1.26% vs 0.19%). Progressive converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.9% versus 12.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PGR | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $214.12 | $360.61 |
| Market cap | $124.28B | $75.21B |
| 1-day change | +0.98% | -0.01% |
| YTD return | -5.97% | +24.32% |
| 1-year return | -12.21% | +26.54% |
| 5-year return | +134.65% | +131.69% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.74 | 9.69 |
| Forward P/E | 13.08 | 11.85 |
| EPS (TTM) | $19.94 | $37.23 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 1.26% |
| Annual dividend | $0.40 | $4.55 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $87.67B | $48.83B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +16.32% | +5.18% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $11.31B | $6.29B |
| Net margin | 12.90% | 12.88% |
| 52-week high | $245.64 | $398.70 |
| 52-week low | $189.20 | $252.26 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.83% | -9.55% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.73% | -0.12% |
| Average volume | 2.67M | 1.68M |
| Shares outstanding | 580.40M | 208.58M |
| Employees | 70,053 | 34,000 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- TRV has outperformed PGR by 38.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Travelers Companies offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.26% vs 0.19%).
- Progressive grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+16.32% vs +5.18%).
About Progressive
PGR stock →The Progressive Corporation operates as an insurance company in the United States. It writes insurance for personal autos and special lines products, including motorcycles, RVs, and watercraft; and personal residential property insurance for homeowners and renters.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 70,053 employees
About Travelers Companies
TRV stock →The Travelers Companies, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides a range of commercial and personal property, and casualty insurance products and services to businesses, government units, associations, and individuals in the United States, Canada, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Business Insurance, Bond & Specialty Insurance, and Personal Insurance.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 34,000 employees
PGR vs TRV FAQ
Which is bigger, Progressive or Travelers Companies?
Progressive (PGR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $124.28B compared with $75.21B for Travelers Companies (TRV).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PGR or TRV?
TRV returned +26.54% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.21% for PGR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PGR or TRV?
TRV has the lower trailing P/E at 9.7, versus 10.7 for PGR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Progressive or Travelers Companies?
Travelers Companies has the higher yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.19% for Progressive.
Are Progressive and Travelers Companies in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.