Palomar (PLMR) vs SiriusPoint (SPNT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
SiriusPoint (SPNT) has outperformed Palomar (PLMR) over the past year, gaining 35.9% versus a gain of 9.9%. Over five years, SPNT leads with a +161.4% price change compared with +55.2% for PLMR. Palomar is the larger company by market cap ($3.36 billion vs $2.86 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, SiriusPoint trades at a lower forward P/E (8.9x vs 11.2x for Palomar). Palomar converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 22.5% versus 14.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PLMR | SPNT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $126.82 | $24.62 |
| Market cap | $3.36B | $2.86B |
| 1-day change | -0.05% | +0.04% |
| YTD return | -5.89% | +12.47% |
| 1-year return | +9.86% | +35.87% |
| 5-year return | +55.17% | +161.36% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.07 | 6.06 |
| Forward P/E | 11.17 | 8.88 |
| EPS (TTM) | $7.43 | $4.06 |
| Dividend yield | 1.42% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $875.97M | $3.21B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +58.16% | +23.09% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $197.07M | $459.60M |
| Net margin | 22.50% | 14.34% |
| 52-week high | $147.62 | $26.50 |
| 52-week low | $100.81 | $17.39 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.09% | -7.09% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +27.74% | +16.77% |
| Average volume | 241.79K | 795.73K |
| Shares outstanding | 26.50M | 116.17M |
| Employees | 439 | 1,037 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SPNT has outperformed PLMR by 26.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Palomar trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.1x vs 6.1x trailing P/E).
- Palomar offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.42% vs 0.00%).
- Palomar is more profitable, keeping 22.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.3 cents for SiriusPoint.
- Palomar grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+58.16% vs +23.09%).
About Palomar
PLMR stock →Palomar Holdings, Inc., a specialty insurance company, provides property and casualty insurance to individuals and businesses in the United States. The company offers personal and commercial specialty insurance products, including residential and commercial earthquake; fronting; and inland marine and other property products, such as inland marine, Hawaii hurricane, excess national property, residential flood, and other property products, as well as assumed reinsurance and crop insurance products.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 439 employees
About SiriusPoint
SPNT stock →SiriusPoint Ltd. provides multi-line reinsurance and insurance products and services worldwide.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 1,037 employees
PLMR vs SPNT FAQ
Which is bigger, Palomar or SiriusPoint?
Palomar (PLMR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.36B compared with $2.86B for SiriusPoint (SPNT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PLMR or SPNT?
SPNT returned +35.87% over the past 12 months, compared with +9.86% for PLMR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PLMR or SPNT?
SPNT has the lower trailing P/E at 6.1, versus 17.1 for PLMR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Palomar or SiriusPoint?
Palomar pays a dividend yielding 1.42%, while SiriusPoint does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Palomar and SiriusPoint in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.