RingCentral (RNG) vs Science Applications International (SAIC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
RingCentral (RNG) has outperformed Science Applications International (SAIC) over the past year, gaining 189.2% versus a gain of 28.0%. Over five years, SAIC leads with a +43.9% price change compared with -66.7% for RNG. RingCentral is the larger company by market cap ($6.54 billion vs $5.43 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Science Applications International trades at a lower forward P/E (11.3x vs 14.0x for RingCentral). Science Applications International offers the higher dividend yield (1.14% vs 0.19%). Science Applications International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.9% versus 1.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | RNG | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $78.35 | $129.71 |
| Market cap | $6.54B | $5.43B |
| 1-day change | +2.36% | +6.25% |
| YTD return | +171.30% | +28.86% |
| 1-year return | +189.22% | +27.96% |
| 5-year return | -66.71% | +43.87% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 62.68 | 15.14 |
| Forward P/E | 14.04 | 11.29 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.25 | $8.57 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 1.14% |
| Annual dividend | $0.15 | $1.48 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.52B | $7.26B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.78% | -2.90% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $43.39M | $358.00M |
| Gross margin | 71.24% | 12.01% |
| Operating margin | 4.79% | 7.17% |
| Net margin | 1.73% | 4.93% |
| 52-week high | $81.90 | $142.66 |
| 52-week low | $24.14 | $81.08 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -4.33% | -9.08% |
| Analyst consensus | none | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -26.43% | +2.31% |
| Average volume | 1.83M | 442.53K |
| Shares outstanding | 73.74M | 41.90M |
| Employees | 7,378 | 23,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | EDP Services | EDP Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RNG has outperformed SAIC by 161.3 percentage points over the past year.
- RingCentral trades at a higher earnings multiple (62.7x vs 15.1x trailing P/E).
- RingCentral grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+4.78% vs -2.90%).
About RingCentral
RNG stock →RingCentral, Inc., an agentic voice AIpowered cloud business communication services provider, delivering an integrated platform for business phone, SMS, contact center, workforce engagement management, video collaboration, and messaging. The company's products include RingEX, a AI-powered unified communications as a service platform for collaboration across voice, messaging, and video; RingCentral Contact Center, a contact center solution that delivers AI-powered omni-channel and workforce engagement solutions; RingCentral Customer Engagement Bundle, a comprehensive solution that includes phone, messaging, and SMS for businesses; and RingCX, a contact center as a service solution for AI-powered customer engagement with CRM integrations.
Technology · EDP Services · 7,378 employees
About Science Applications International
SAIC stock →Science Applications International Corporation provides technical, engineering, and mission and enterprise information technology (IT) services in the United States. It operates through two segments, Defense and Intelligence; and Civilian.
Technology · EDP Services · 23,000 employees
RNG vs SAIC FAQ
Which is bigger, RingCentral or Science Applications International?
RingCentral (RNG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.54B compared with $5.43B for Science Applications International (SAIC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, RNG or SAIC?
RNG returned +189.22% over the past 12 months, compared with +27.96% for SAIC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, RNG or SAIC?
SAIC has the lower trailing P/E at 15.1, versus 62.7 for RNG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, RingCentral or Science Applications International?
Science Applications International has the higher yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.19% for RingCentral.
Are RingCentral and Science Applications International in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the EDP Services industry within the Technology sector.