MetaCap

Roper Technologies (ROP) vs Symbotic (SYM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Roper Technologies (ROP) has outperformed Symbotic (SYM) over the past year, losing 29.8% versus a loss of 36.7%. Over five years, SYM leads with a +339.2% price change compared with -23.2% for ROP. Roper Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($35.46 billion vs $26.22 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Symbotic is growing revenue faster (+25.7% vs +12.3%).

On valuation, Roper Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (14.7x vs 56.1x for Symbotic). Roper Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.99%, while Symbotic does not currently pay one. Roper Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 19.4% versus -0.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ROP-29.77%SYM-36.70%
+31%-8%-48%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ROP-20.60%SYM+339.70%
+789%+361%-68%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ROP versus SYM key metrics
MetricROPSYM
Share price$358.57$43.31
Market cap$35.46B$26.22B
1-day change-1.02%-1.90%
YTD return-19.45%-27.21%
1-year return-29.77%-36.70%
5-year return-23.23%+339.25%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.94541.38
Forward P/E14.7156.13
EPS (TTM)$24.00$0.08
Dividend yield0.99%0.00%
Annual dividend$3.56$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$7.90B$2.25B
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.26%+25.65%
Net income (latest FY)$1.54B$-16.94M
Gross margin69.24%18.81%
Operating margin28.29%-5.12%
Net margin19.44%-0.75%
52-week high$520.85$87.88
52-week low$305.96$37.68
Distance from 52-week high-31.16%-50.72%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+22.55%+45.14%
Average volume806.13K1.62M
Shares outstanding98.90M129.87M
Employees19,4002,000
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Symbotic trades at a higher earnings multiple (541.4x vs 14.9x trailing P/E).
  • Roper Technologies is more profitable, keeping 19.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.8 cents for Symbotic.
  • Symbotic grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+25.65% vs +12.26%).

About Roper Technologies

ROP stock →

Roper Technologies, Inc. designs and develops vertical software and technology enabled products in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, and internationally.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 19,400 employees

About Symbotic

SYM stock →

Symbotic Inc., an automation technology company, develops technologies to enhance operating efficiencies in modern warehouses. The company automates the processing of pallets, cases, and individual items in warehouses.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,000 employees

ROP vs SYM FAQ

Which is bigger, Roper Technologies or Symbotic?

Roper Technologies (ROP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $35.46B compared with $26.22B for Symbotic (SYM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ROP or SYM?

ROP returned -29.77% over the past 12 months, compared with -36.70% for SYM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ROP or SYM?

ROP has the lower trailing P/E at 14.9, versus 541.4 for SYM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Roper Technologies or Symbotic?

Roper Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.99%, while Symbotic does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Roper Technologies and Symbotic in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons