Snap-On (SNA) vs Woodward (WWD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Woodward (WWD) has outperformed Snap-On (SNA) over the past year, gaining 27.4% versus a gain of 6.8%. Over five years, WWD leads with a +180.8% price change compared with +64.2% for SNA. Woodward is the larger company by market cap ($19.23 billion vs $18.45 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Snap-On trades at a lower forward P/E (16.6x vs 30.3x for Woodward). Snap-On offers the higher dividend yield (2.65% vs 0.30%). Snap-On converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 19.7% versus 12.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | SNA | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $356.60 | $325.76 |
| Market cap | $18.45B | $19.23B |
| 1-day change | -0.92% | +0.47% |
| YTD return | +4.44% | +7.25% |
| 1-year return | +6.84% | +27.41% |
| 5-year return | +64.21% | +180.83% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 18.18 | 36.24 |
| Forward P/E | 16.61 | 30.33 |
| EPS (TTM) | $19.62 | $8.99 |
| Dividend yield | 2.65% | 0.30% |
| Annual dividend | $9.46 | $0.98 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.16B | $3.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.93% | +7.30% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.02B | $442.11M |
| Gross margin | — | 26.81% |
| Operating margin | 25.75% | — |
| Net margin | 19.72% | 12.39% |
| 52-week high | $423.02 | $450.92 |
| 52-week low | $320.80 | $244.69 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.70% | -27.76% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +16.35% | +33.15% |
| Average volume | 314.80K | 669.89K |
| Shares outstanding | 51.73M | 59.05M |
| Employees | 13,000 | 10,200 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Energy |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WWD has outperformed SNA by 20.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Woodward trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.2x vs 18.2x trailing P/E).
- Snap-On offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.65% vs 0.30%).
- Snap-On is more profitable, keeping 19.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 12.4 cents for Woodward.
- Woodward grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.30% vs +0.93%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Snap-On in Consumer Discretionary and Woodward in Energy.
About Snap-On
SNA stock →Snap-on Incorporated manufactures and markets tools, equipment, diagnostics, and repair information and systems solutions for professional users worldwide. It operates through Commercial & Industrial Group, Snap-on Tools Group, Repair Systems & Information Group, and Financial Services segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Industrial Machinery/Components · 13,000 employees
About Woodward
WWD stock →Woodward, Inc. designs, manufactures, and services control solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets worldwide.
Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
SNA vs WWD FAQ
Which is bigger, Snap-On or Woodward?
Woodward (WWD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $19.23B compared with $18.45B for Snap-On (SNA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, SNA or WWD?
WWD returned +27.41% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.84% for SNA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, SNA or WWD?
SNA has the lower trailing P/E at 18.2, versus 36.2 for WWD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Snap-On or Woodward?
Snap-On has the higher yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.30% for Woodward.
Are Snap-On and Woodward in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.