Sonida Senior Living (SNDA) vs Universal Health Services (UHS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Sonida Senior Living (SNDA) has outperformed Universal Health Services (UHS) over the past year, gaining 31.6% versus a loss of 14.4%. Over five years, UHS leads with a +32.1% price change compared with +14.0% for SNDA. Universal Health Services is the larger company by market cap ($10.45 billion vs $1.69 billion), about 6.2 times the size, while Sonida Senior Living is growing revenue faster (+25.2% vs +9.7%).
Universal Health Services pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while Sonida Senior Living does not currently pay one. Universal Health Services converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus -18.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | SNDA | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.24 | $177.35 |
| Market cap | $1.69B | $10.45B |
| 1-day change | -2.00% | +0.93% |
| YTD return | +8.07% | -19.40% |
| 1-year return | +31.59% | -14.37% |
| 5-year return | +14.01% | +32.10% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 7.23 |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.40 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-5.67 | $24.52 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.45% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.80 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $381.14M | $17.36B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +25.24% | +9.71% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-70.78M | $1.49B |
| Operating margin | — | 11.48% |
| Net margin | -18.57% | 8.57% |
| 52-week high | $44.39 | $246.33 |
| 52-week low | $24.95 | $140.08 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -20.61% | -28.00% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +40.47% | +9.92% |
| Average volume | 462.78K | 789.88K |
| Shares outstanding | 48.05M | 51.69M |
| Employees | 3,423 | 102,000 |
| Sector | Health Care | Health Care |
| Industry | Hospital/Nursing Management | Hospital/Nursing Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Universal Health Services is about 6.2 times larger than Sonida Senior Living by market value ($10.45B vs $1.69B).
- SNDA has outperformed UHS by 46.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Universal Health Services is more profitable, keeping 8.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -18.6 cents for Sonida Senior Living.
- Sonida Senior Living grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+25.24% vs +9.71%).
About Sonida Senior Living
SNDA stock →Sonida Senior Living, Inc. owns and operates senior housing communities in the United States.
Health Care · Hospital/Nursing Management · 3,423 employees
About Universal Health Services
UHS stock →Universal Health Services, Inc., through its subsidiaries, owns and operates acute care hospitals, and outpatient and behavioral health care facilities in the United States. It operates through Acute Care Hospital Services and Behavioral Health Care Services segments.
Health Care · Hospital/Nursing Management · 102,000 employees
SNDA vs UHS FAQ
Which is bigger, Sonida Senior Living or Universal Health Services?
Universal Health Services (UHS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.45B compared with $1.69B for Sonida Senior Living (SNDA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, SNDA or UHS?
SNDA returned +31.59% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.37% for UHS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Sonida Senior Living or Universal Health Services?
Universal Health Services pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while Sonida Senior Living does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Sonida Senior Living and Universal Health Services in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Hospital/Nursing Management industry within the Health Care sector.