MetaCap

Tapestry (TPR) vs Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) has outperformed Tapestry (TPR) over the past year, gaining 23.6% versus a loss of 0.8%. Tapestry is the larger company by market cap ($22.98 billion vs $3.37 billion), about 6.8 times the size. On valuation, Tapestry trades at a lower forward P/E (13.0x vs 21.0x for Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.).

Tapestry offers the higher dividend yield (1.38% vs 0.96%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

TPR-0.85%ZGN+23.59%
+54%+18%-19%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
TPR+174.89%ZGN+1.58%
+310%+124%-62%
Dec 20, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

TPR versus ZGN key metrics
MetricTPRZGN
Share price$115.82$12.52
Market cap$22.98B$3.37B
1-day change+2.12%+2.71%
YTD return-9.35%+22.15%
1-year return-0.85%+23.59%
5-year return+189.34%—
P/E ratio (TTM)15.9335.77
Forward P/E13.0121.01
EPS (TTM)$7.27$0.35
Dividend yield1.38%0.96%
Annual dividend$1.60$0.12
Revenue (latest FY)$8.00B—
Revenue growth (YoY)+14.17%—
Net income (latest FY)$1.53B—
Gross margin77.82%—
Operating margin23.92%—
Net margin19.09%—
52-week high$164.80$15.95
52-week low$93.00$8.64
Distance from 52-week high-29.72%-21.50%
Analyst consensusnonebuy
Avg. price target upside+43.76%+15.26%
Average volume3.02M1.09M
Shares outstanding198.44M268.89M
Employees12,6007,600
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Cyclical
IndustryApparelApparel Manufacturing

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Tapestry is about 6.8 times larger than Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. by market value ($22.98B vs $3.37B).
  • ZGN has outperformed TPR by 24.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. trades at a higher earnings multiple (35.8x vs 15.9x trailing P/E).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Tapestry in Consumer Discretionary and Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. in Consumer Cyclical.

About Tapestry

TPR stock →

Tapestry, Inc. provides accessories and lifestyle brand products in North America, Greater China, rest of Asia, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 12,600 employees

About Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.

ZGN stock →

Ermenegildo Zegna N.V., together with its subsidiaries, designs, produces, markets, and distributes luxury menswear and womenwear, children's clothing, footwear, leather goods, and other accessories worldwide. It offers luxury leisurewear, such as knitwear, jeans, jersey and shirts, fabric and leather outerwear, and accessories; formalwear, including formal suits to tuxedos, shirts, blazers, formal coats, and accessories; and leather accessories comprising sneakers and other shoes, bags, belts and small leather accessories.

Consumer Cyclical · Apparel Manufacturing · 7,600 employees

TPR vs ZGN FAQ

Which is bigger, Tapestry or Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.?

Tapestry (TPR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $22.98B compared with $3.37B for Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, TPR or ZGN?

ZGN returned +23.59% over the past 12 months, compared with -0.85% for TPR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, TPR or ZGN?

TPR has the lower trailing P/E at 15.9, versus 35.8 for ZGN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Tapestry or Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.?

Tapestry has the higher yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.96% for Ermenegildo Zegna N.V..

Are Tapestry and Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. in the same industry?

No. Tapestry is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. is in Consumer Cyclical.

More comparisons