MetaCap

T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) vs Victory Capital (VCTR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Victory Capital (VCTR) has outperformed T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) over the past year, gaining 68.3% versus a loss of 1.6%. Over five years, VCTR leads with a +203.4% price change compared with -47.9% for TROW. T. Rowe Price Group is the larger company by market cap ($22.09 billion vs $6.82 billion), about 3.2 times the size, while Victory Capital is growing revenue faster (+46.2% vs +3.1%).

On valuation, T. Rowe Price Group trades at a lower forward P/E (10.0x vs 12.9x for Victory Capital). T. Rowe Price Group offers the higher dividend yield (4.96% vs 1.78%). T. Rowe Price Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 28.5% versus 25.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

TROW-1.62%VCTR+68.30%
+87%+32%-24%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
TROW-46.73%VCTR+203.78%
+235%+82%-72%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

TROW versus VCTR key metrics
MetricTROWVCTR
Share price$103.56$110.91
Market cap$22.09B$6.82B
1-day change-0.49%-0.84%
YTD return+1.65%+77.29%
1-year return-1.62%+68.30%
5-year return-47.90%+203.36%
P/E ratio (TTM)10.4020.28
Forward P/E10.0412.94
EPS (TTM)$9.96$5.47
Dividend yield4.96%1.78%
Annual dividend$5.14$1.97
Revenue (latest FY)$7.31B$1.31B
Revenue growth (YoY)+3.12%+46.19%
Net income (latest FY)$2.09B$330.06M
Operating margin29.92%36.63%
Net margin28.53%25.27%
52-week high$122.00$123.55
52-week low$85.22$57.03
Distance from 52-week high-15.11%-10.23%
Analyst consensusholdhold
Avg. price target upside+3.62%+7.00%
Average volume1.68M633.41K
Shares outstanding213.32M61.51M
Employees7,544699
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • T. Rowe Price Group is about 3.2 times larger than Victory Capital by market value ($22.09B vs $6.82B).
  • VCTR has outperformed TROW by 69.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Victory Capital trades at a higher earnings multiple (20.3x vs 10.4x trailing P/E).
  • T. Rowe Price Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.96% vs 1.78%).
  • Victory Capital grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+46.19% vs +3.12%).

About T. Rowe Price Group

TROW stock →

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Finance · Investment Managers · 7,544 employees

About Victory Capital

VCTR stock →

Victory Capital Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an asset management company in the United States and internationally. It offers specialized investment strategies to institutions, intermediaries, retirement platforms, and individual investors.

Finance · Investment Managers · 699 employees

TROW vs VCTR FAQ

Which is bigger, T. Rowe Price Group or Victory Capital?

T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $22.09B compared with $6.82B for Victory Capital (VCTR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, TROW or VCTR?

VCTR returned +68.30% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.62% for TROW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, TROW or VCTR?

TROW has the lower trailing P/E at 10.4, versus 20.3 for VCTR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, T. Rowe Price Group or Victory Capital?

T. Rowe Price Group has the higher yield at 4.96%, compared with 1.78% for Victory Capital.

Are T. Rowe Price Group and Victory Capital in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons