Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) vs Artisan Partners Asset Management (APAM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) has outperformed Artisan Partners Asset Management (APAM) over the past year, gaining 108.2% versus a loss of 22.4%. Over five years, AAMI leads with a +245.9% price change compared with -28.5% for APAM. Acadian Asset Management is the larger company by market cap ($3.28 billion vs $2.40 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Artisan Partners Asset Management trades at a lower forward P/E (8.7x vs 14.3x for Acadian Asset Management). Artisan Partners Asset Management offers the higher dividend yield (10.25% vs 0.33%). Artisan Partners Asset Management converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 24.3% versus 14.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AAMI | APAM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $92.55 | $33.75 |
| Market cap | $3.28B | $2.40B |
| 1-day change | -1.01% | -3.57% |
| YTD return | +96.91% | -17.16% |
| 1-year return | +108.16% | -22.45% |
| 5-year return | +245.85% | -28.54% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 33.17 | 8.44 |
| Forward P/E | 14.28 | 8.72 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.79 | $4.00 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 10.25% |
| Annual dividend | $0.31 | $3.46 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $563.70M | $1.20B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.49% | +7.63% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $80.00M | $290.32M |
| Operating margin | 23.43% | 33.39% |
| Net margin | 14.19% | 24.26% |
| 52-week high | $98.52 | $46.53 |
| 52-week low | $41.47 | $33.39 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.06% | -27.47% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -1.67% | +14.07% |
| Average volume | 424.01K | 914.18K |
| Shares outstanding | 35.49M | 71.00M |
| Employees | 396 | 567 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AAMI has outperformed APAM by 130.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Acadian Asset Management trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.2x vs 8.4x trailing P/E).
- Artisan Partners Asset Management offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.25% vs 0.33%).
- Artisan Partners Asset Management is more profitable, keeping 24.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.2 cents for Acadian Asset Management.
About Acadian Asset Management
AAMI stock →Acadian Asset Management Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 396 employees
About Artisan Partners Asset Management
APAM stock →Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. is publicly owned investment manager.
Finance · Investment Managers · 567 employees
AAMI vs APAM FAQ
Which is bigger, Acadian Asset Management or Artisan Partners Asset Management?
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.28B compared with $2.40B for Artisan Partners Asset Management (APAM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AAMI or APAM?
AAMI returned +108.16% over the past 12 months, compared with -22.45% for APAM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AAMI or APAM?
APAM has the lower trailing P/E at 8.4, versus 33.2 for AAMI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acadian Asset Management or Artisan Partners Asset Management?
Artisan Partners Asset Management has the higher yield at 10.25%, compared with 0.33% for Acadian Asset Management.
Are Acadian Asset Management and Artisan Partners Asset Management in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.