Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) vs Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) has outperformed Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) over the past year, gaining 108.2% versus a loss of 32.8%. Blue Owl Technology Finance is the larger company by market cap ($4.30 billion vs $3.31 billion), about 1.3 times the size. On valuation, Blue Owl Technology Finance trades at a lower forward P/E (6.9x vs 14.4x for Acadian Asset Management).
Blue Owl Technology Finance offers the higher dividend yield (14.91% vs 0.33%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AAMI | OTF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $93.30 | $9.39 |
| Market cap | $3.31B | $4.30B |
| 1-day change | +0.81% | +1.51% |
| YTD return | +96.91% | -35.42% |
| 1-year return | +108.16% | -32.78% |
| 5-year return | +245.85% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 33.09 | 11.74 |
| Forward P/E | 14.40 | 6.86 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.82 | $0.80 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 14.91% |
| Annual dividend | $0.31 | $1.40 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $563.70M | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.49% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $80.00M | $720.37M |
| Operating margin | 23.43% | — |
| Net margin | 14.19% | — |
| 52-week high | $98.52 | $15.00 |
| 52-week low | $41.47 | $9.14 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.30% | -37.40% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | none |
| Avg. price target upside | -2.47% | +44.94% |
| Average volume | 424.77K | 2.44M |
| Shares outstanding | 35.49M | 458.19M |
| Employees | 396 | — |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AAMI has outperformed OTF by 140.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Acadian Asset Management trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.1x vs 11.7x trailing P/E).
- Blue Owl Technology Finance offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (14.91% vs 0.33%).
About Acadian Asset Management
AAMI stock →Acadian Asset Management Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Financial Services · Asset Management · 396 employees
About Blue Owl Technology Finance
OTF stock →Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. is a business development company specializes in upper middle-market, making debt and equity investments such as senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans and equity-related securities including common equity, warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, finance and business development company.
Financial Services · Asset Management
AAMI vs OTF FAQ
Which is bigger, Acadian Asset Management or Blue Owl Technology Finance?
Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.30B compared with $3.31B for Acadian Asset Management (AAMI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AAMI or OTF?
AAMI returned +108.16% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.78% for OTF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AAMI or OTF?
OTF has the lower trailing P/E at 11.7, versus 33.1 for AAMI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acadian Asset Management or Blue Owl Technology Finance?
Blue Owl Technology Finance has the higher yield at 14.91%, compared with 0.33% for Acadian Asset Management.
Are Acadian Asset Management and Blue Owl Technology Finance in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector.