Federated Hermes (FHI) vs Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Federated Hermes (FHI) has outperformed Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) over the past year, gaining 6.8% versus a loss of 32.8%. Blue Owl Technology Finance is the larger company by market cap ($4.30 billion vs $4.18 billion), about 1.0 times the size. On valuation, Blue Owl Technology Finance trades at a lower forward P/E (6.9x vs 9.6x for Federated Hermes).
Blue Owl Technology Finance offers the higher dividend yield (14.91% vs 2.50%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FHI | OTF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $55.95 | $9.39 |
| Market cap | $4.18B | $4.30B |
| 1-day change | +0.18% | +1.51% |
| YTD return | +7.45% | -35.42% |
| 1-year return | +6.80% | -32.78% |
| 5-year return | +69.14% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.42 | 11.74 |
| Forward P/E | 9.60 | 6.86 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.37 | $0.80 |
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | 14.91% |
| Annual dividend | $1.40 | $1.40 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.80B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.33% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $403.30M | $720.37M |
| Operating margin | 28.54% | — |
| Net margin | 22.40% | — |
| 52-week high | $67.20 | $15.00 |
| 52-week low | $46.66 | $9.14 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.74% | -37.40% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.49% | +44.94% |
| Average volume | 604.39K | 2.44M |
| Shares outstanding | 74.65M | 458.19M |
| Employees | 2,091 | — |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FHI has outperformed OTF by 39.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Blue Owl Technology Finance offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (14.91% vs 2.50%).
About Federated Hermes
FHI stock →Federated Hermes, Inc. is a publicly owned investment manager.
Financial Services · Asset Management · 2,091 employees
About Blue Owl Technology Finance
OTF stock →Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. is a business development company specializes in upper middle-market, making debt and equity investments such as senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans and equity-related securities including common equity, warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, finance and business development company.
Financial Services · Asset Management
FHI vs OTF FAQ
Which is bigger, Federated Hermes or Blue Owl Technology Finance?
Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.30B compared with $4.18B for Federated Hermes (FHI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FHI or OTF?
FHI returned +6.80% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.78% for OTF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FHI or OTF?
FHI has the lower trailing P/E at 10.4, versus 11.7 for OTF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Federated Hermes or Blue Owl Technology Finance?
Blue Owl Technology Finance has the higher yield at 14.91%, compared with 2.50% for Federated Hermes.
Are Federated Hermes and Blue Owl Technology Finance in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector.