MetaCap

Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) vs Rush Enterprises (RUSHA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Rush Enterprises (RUSHA) has outperformed Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) over the past year, gaining 36.3% versus a loss of 31.1%. Over five years, RUSHA leads with a +112.6% price change compared with -20.3% for ABG. Rush Enterprises is the larger company by market cap ($5.27 billion vs $3.01 billion), about 1.7 times the size.

On valuation, Asbury Automotive Group trades at a lower forward P/E (5.7x vs 14.8x for Rush Enterprises). Rush Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 1.12%, while Asbury Automotive Group does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ABG-31.10%RUSHA+36.26%
+71%+18%-36%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ABG-19.63%RUSHA+116.97%
+173%+66%-41%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ABG versus RUSHA key metrics
MetricABGRUSHA
Share price$167.77$45.13
Market cap$3.01B$5.27B
1-day change-1.17%-4.08%
YTD return-27.94%+25.50%
1-year return-31.10%+36.26%
5-year return-20.35%+112.57%
P/E ratio (TTM)6.2520.42
Forward P/E5.6714.78
EPS (TTM)$26.86$2.21
Dividend yield0.00%1.12%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.507
Revenue (latest FY)—$7.43B
Revenue growth (YoY)—-4.75%
Net income (latest FY)—$263.78M
Gross margin—19.65%
Operating margin—5.30%
Net margin—3.55%
52-week high$258.75$55.74
52-week low$165.85$30.45
Distance from 52-week high-35.16%-19.03%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+46.25%+30.36%
Average volume251.85K673.64K
Shares outstanding17.95M91.71M
Employees15,0007,858
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryRetail-Auto Dealers and Gas StationsRetail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • RUSHA has outperformed ABG by 67.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Rush Enterprises trades at a higher earnings multiple (20.4x vs 6.2x trailing P/E).
  • Rush Enterprises offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.12% vs 0.00%).

About Asbury Automotive Group

ABG stock →

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an automotive retailer in the United States. It operates through Dealerships; and Total Care Auto, Powered by Asbury (TCA) segments.

Consumer Discretionary · Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations · 15,000 employees

About Rush Enterprises

RUSHA stock →

Rush Enterprises, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States and Canada. The company operates a network of commercial vehicle dealerships under the Rush Truck Centers name.

Consumer Discretionary · Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations · 7,858 employees

ABG vs RUSHA FAQ

Which is bigger, Asbury Automotive Group or Rush Enterprises?

Rush Enterprises (RUSHA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.27B compared with $3.01B for Asbury Automotive Group (ABG).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ABG or RUSHA?

RUSHA returned +36.26% over the past 12 months, compared with -31.10% for ABG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ABG or RUSHA?

ABG has the lower trailing P/E at 6.2, versus 20.4 for RUSHA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Asbury Automotive Group or Rush Enterprises?

Rush Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 1.12%, while Asbury Automotive Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Asbury Automotive Group and Rush Enterprises in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons