Alamos Gold (AGI) vs Gold Fields (GFI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Alamos Gold (AGI) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, losing 6.0% versus a loss of 16.2%. Over five years, AGI leads with a +290.2% price change compared with +274.1% for GFI. Gold Fields is the larger company by market cap ($31.23 billion vs $13.20 billion), about 2.4 times the size, while Alamos Gold is growing revenue faster (+34.3% vs +15.6%).
On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.0x vs 10.4x for Alamos Gold). Gold Fields offers the higher dividend yield (6.10% vs 0.41%). Alamos Gold converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 49.0% versus 23.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AGI | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $31.53 | $35.05 |
| Market cap | $13.20B | $31.23B |
| 1-day change | -3.67% | -3.10% |
| YTD return | -18.27% | -19.72% |
| 1-year return | -5.96% | -16.25% |
| 5-year return | +290.22% | +274.07% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 11.76 | 7.41 |
| Forward P/E | 10.40 | 6.96 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.68 | $4.73 |
| Dividend yield | 0.41% | 6.10% |
| Annual dividend | $0.13 | $2.14 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.81B | $5.20B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +34.29% | +15.57% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $885.80M | $1.25B |
| Gross margin | 55.25% | 45.33% |
| Operating margin | 60.68% | — |
| Net margin | 48.97% | 23.93% |
| 52-week high | $55.41 | $61.64 |
| 52-week low | $27.05 | $31.11 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -43.10% | -43.14% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +46.69% | +38.86% |
| Average volume | 4.20M | 3.75M |
| Shares outstanding | 418.60M | 890.90M |
| Employees | 2,400 | — |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Gold Fields is about 2.4 times larger than Alamos Gold by market value ($31.23B vs $13.20B).
- AGI has outperformed GFI by 10.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Alamos Gold trades at a higher earnings multiple (11.8x vs 7.4x trailing P/E).
- Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.10% vs 0.41%).
- Alamos Gold is more profitable, keeping 49.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.9 cents for Gold Fields.
- Alamos Gold grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+34.29% vs +15.57%).
About Alamos Gold
AGI stock →Alamos Gold Inc. operates as a gold producer in Canada and Mexico.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals · 2,400 employees
About Gold Fields
GFI stock →Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
AGI vs GFI FAQ
Which is bigger, Alamos Gold or Gold Fields?
Gold Fields (GFI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $31.23B compared with $13.20B for Alamos Gold (AGI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AGI or GFI?
AGI returned -5.96% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.25% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AGI or GFI?
GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.4, versus 11.8 for AGI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Alamos Gold or Gold Fields?
Gold Fields has the higher yield at 6.10%, compared with 0.41% for Alamos Gold.
Are Alamos Gold and Gold Fields in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.