MetaCap

Gold Fields (GFI) vs Kinross Gold (KGC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Kinross Gold (KGC) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, losing 7.8% versus a loss of 17.4%. Over five years, GFI leads with a +282.7% price change compared with +282.0% for KGC. Gold Fields is the larger company by market cap ($32.70 billion vs $28.25 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Kinross Gold is growing revenue faster (+36.9% vs +15.6%).

On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.3x vs 8.6x for Kinross Gold). Gold Fields offers the higher dividend yield (5.82% vs 0.65%). Kinross Gold converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 33.9% versus 23.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GFI-17.35%KGC-7.78%
+54%+11%-32%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
GFI+310.30%KGC+311.64%
+604%+264%-76%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GFI versus KGC key metrics
MetricGFIKGC
Share price$36.71$23.82
Market cap$32.70B$28.25B
1-day change+2.36%+2.04%
YTD return-17.87%-17.12%
1-year return-17.35%-7.78%
5-year return+282.71%+282.00%
P/E ratio (TTM)7.529.06
Forward P/E7.288.56
EPS (TTM)$4.88$2.63
Dividend yield5.82%0.65%
Annual dividend$2.14$0.155
Revenue (latest FY)$5.20B$7.05B
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.57%+36.95%
Net income (latest FY)$1.25B$2.39B
Gross margin45.33%52.70%
Operating margin—46.48%
Net margin23.93%33.90%
52-week high$61.64$39.11
52-week low$31.11$22.01
Distance from 52-week high-40.45%-39.11%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+32.60%+42.18%
Average volume3.74M7.95M
Shares outstanding890.90M1.19B
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryPrecious MetalsPrecious Metals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.82% vs 0.65%).
  • Kinross Gold is more profitable, keeping 33.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.9 cents for Gold Fields.
  • Kinross Gold grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+36.95% vs +15.57%).

About Gold Fields

GFI stock →

Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.

Basic Materials · Precious Metals

About Kinross Gold

KGC stock →

Kinross Gold Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of gold properties principally in the United States, Brazil, Chile, Canada, and Mauritania. It is also involved in the extraction and processing of gold-containing ores; reclamation of gold mining properties; and production and sale of silver.

Basic Materials · Precious Metals

GFI vs KGC FAQ

Which is bigger, Gold Fields or Kinross Gold?

Gold Fields (GFI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.70B compared with $28.25B for Kinross Gold (KGC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFI or KGC?

KGC returned -7.78% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.35% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, GFI or KGC?

GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.5, versus 9.1 for KGC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Gold Fields or Kinross Gold?

Gold Fields has the higher yield at 5.82%, compared with 0.65% for Kinross Gold.

Are Gold Fields and Kinross Gold in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.

More comparisons