Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM.A) vs Oportun Financial (OPRT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Oportun Financial (OPRT) has outperformed Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM.A) over the past year, gaining 65.5% versus a gain of 16.4%. Over five years, AGM.A leads with a +31.5% price change compared with -64.7% for OPRT. Federal Agricultural Mortgage is the larger company by market cap ($1.53 billion vs $410.2 million), about 3.7 times the size.
On valuation, Federal Agricultural Mortgage trades at a lower trailing P/E (7.7x vs 22.3x for Oportun Financial). Federal Agricultural Mortgage pays a dividend yielding 4.40%, while Oportun Financial does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AGM.A | OPRT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $140.87 | $8.92 |
| Market cap | $1.53B | $410.21M |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | +3.00% |
| YTD return | +6.24% | +68.62% |
| 1-year return | +16.43% | +65.49% |
| 5-year return | +31.52% | -64.69% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.71 | 22.30 |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.57 |
| EPS (TTM) | $18.28 | $0.40 |
| Dividend yield | 4.40% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $6.20 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $408.37M | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.88% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $207.41M | — |
| Net margin | 50.79% | — |
| 52-week high | $176.00 | $9.07 |
| 52-week low | $115.00 | $4.03 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.96% | -1.65% |
| Analyst consensus | — | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | — | +17.71% |
| Average volume | 575 | 540.63K |
| Shares outstanding | 1.03M | 45.99M |
| Employees | 212 | 2,405 |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Credit Services | Credit Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Federal Agricultural Mortgage is about 3.7 times larger than Oportun Financial by market value ($1.53B vs $410.21M).
- OPRT has outperformed AGM.A by 49.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Oportun Financial trades at a higher earnings multiple (22.3x vs 7.7x trailing P/E).
- Federal Agricultural Mortgage offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.40% vs 0.00%).
About Federal Agricultural Mortgage
AGM.A stock →Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation provides a secondary market for various loans made to borrowers in the United States. It operates through seven segments: Farm & Ranch, Corporate AgFinance, Power & Utilities, Broadband Infrastructure, Renewable Energy, Funding, and Investments.
Financial Services · Credit Services · 212 employees
About Oportun Financial
OPRT stock →Oportun Financial Corporation provides financial services in the United States. The company offers personal loans and credit cards.
Financial Services · Credit Services · 2,405 employees
AGM.A vs OPRT FAQ
Which is bigger, Federal Agricultural Mortgage or Oportun Financial?
Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM.A) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.53B compared with $410.21M for Oportun Financial (OPRT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AGM.A or OPRT?
OPRT returned +65.49% over the past 12 months, compared with +16.43% for AGM.A (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AGM.A or OPRT?
AGM.A has the lower trailing P/E at 7.7, versus 22.3 for OPRT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Federal Agricultural Mortgage or Oportun Financial?
Federal Agricultural Mortgage pays a dividend yielding 4.40%, while Oportun Financial does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Federal Agricultural Mortgage and Oportun Financial in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Credit Services industry within the Financial Services sector.