MetaCap

Autoliv (ALV) vs Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) has outperformed Autoliv (ALV) over the past year, losing 4.9% versus a loss of 9.8%. Autoliv is the larger company by market cap ($8.07 billion vs $3.52 billion), about 2.3 times the size, while Atmus Filtration Technologies is growing revenue faster (+5.7% vs +4.1%). On valuation, Autoliv trades at a lower forward P/E (9.5x vs 13.2x for Atmus Filtration Technologies).

Autoliv offers the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.51%). Atmus Filtration Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.8% versus 6.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ALV-9.75%ATMU-4.93%
+49%+14%-22%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
ALV+31.91%ATMU+96.86%
+209%+93%-24%
May 22, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ALV versus ATMU key metrics
MetricALVATMU
Share price$110.14$43.18
Market cap$8.07B$3.52B
1-day change-0.80%+1.31%
YTD return-6.46%-17.90%
1-year return-9.75%-4.93%
5-year return+14.78%—
P/E ratio (TTM)12.9916.48
Forward P/E9.4613.18
EPS (TTM)$8.48$2.62
Dividend yield3.14%0.51%
Annual dividend$3.46$0.22
Revenue (latest FY)$10.81B$1.76B
Revenue growth (YoY)+4.09%+5.67%
Net income (latest FY)$735.00M$207.40M
Gross margin19.18%28.24%
Operating margin10.06%16.95%
Net margin6.80%11.76%
52-week high$132.17$66.50
52-week low$99.16$40.75
Distance from 52-week high-16.67%-35.07%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+21.94%+51.00%
Average volume688.85K693.90K
Shares outstanding73.24M81.60M
Employees56,5154,500
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryAuto Parts:O.E.M.Auto Parts:O.E.M.

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Autoliv is about 2.3 times larger than Atmus Filtration Technologies by market value ($8.07B vs $3.52B).
  • Atmus Filtration Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (16.5x vs 13.0x trailing P/E).
  • Autoliv offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.51%).

About Autoliv

ALV stock →

Autoliv, Inc., through its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, and supplies passive safety systems to the automotive industry in the Americas, Europe, China, and Asia. The company offers passive safety systems, such as modules and components for frontal-impact airbag protection systems, side-impact airbag protection systems, pedestrian protection systems, steering wheels, inflator technologies, battery cut-off switches, and seatbelts.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 56,515 employees

About Atmus Filtration Technologies

ATMU stock →

Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells filtration products under the Fleetguard brand in the United States and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 4,500 employees

ALV vs ATMU FAQ

Which is bigger, Autoliv or Atmus Filtration Technologies?

Autoliv (ALV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.07B compared with $3.52B for Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ALV or ATMU?

ATMU returned -4.93% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.75% for ALV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ALV or ATMU?

ALV has the lower trailing P/E at 13.0, versus 16.5 for ATMU. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Autoliv or Atmus Filtration Technologies?

Autoliv has the higher yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.51% for Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Are Autoliv and Atmus Filtration Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons