Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) vs Dana (DAN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Dana (DAN) has outperformed Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) over the past year, gaining 56.1% versus a gain of 0.0%. Atmus Filtration Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($3.48 billion vs $3.12 billion), about 1.1 times the size. On valuation, Dana trades at a lower forward P/E (7.0x vs 13.0x for Atmus Filtration Technologies).
Dana offers the higher dividend yield (1.52% vs 0.52%). Atmus Filtration Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.8% versus 1.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ATMU | DAN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $42.62 | $29.02 |
| Market cap | $3.48B | $3.12B |
| 1-day change | -3.40% | +3.57% |
| YTD return | -15.01% | +22.14% |
| 1-year return | 0.00% | +56.11% |
| 5-year return | — | +15.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 16.27 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.01 | 6.96 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.62 | $-0.36 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 1.52% |
| Annual dividend | $0.22 | $0.44 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.76B | $7.50B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.67% | -3.03% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $207.40M | $85.00M |
| Gross margin | 28.24% | 8.03% |
| Operating margin | 16.95% | 1.85% |
| Net margin | 11.76% | 1.13% |
| 52-week high | $66.50 | $39.56 |
| 52-week low | $40.76 | $17.74 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -35.91% | -26.64% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +52.98% | +33.25% |
| Average volume | 684.84K | 1.39M |
| Shares outstanding | 81.60M | 107.58M |
| Employees | 4,500 | 27,300 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Auto Parts:O.E.M. |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- DAN has outperformed ATMU by 56.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Dana offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.52% vs 0.52%).
- Atmus Filtration Technologies is more profitable, keeping 11.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.1 cents for Dana.
- Atmus Filtration Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+5.67% vs -3.03%).
About Atmus Filtration Technologies
ATMU stock →Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells filtration products under the Fleetguard brand in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 4,500 employees
About Dana
DAN stock →Dana Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries, provides power-conveyance and energy-management solutions for on-highway vehicles in North America, Europe, South America, and the Asia Pacific. The Light Vehicle segment provides axles, driveshafts, internal combustion engine (ICE), hybrid and electric transmissions, e-axle and e-transmission systems, inverters, electric motors, controllers, sealing and thermal products, e-sealing, e-thermal cooling systems, battery and electronics cooling, hydrogen fuel cell cooling, and new power industrial cooling.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 27,300 employees
ATMU vs DAN FAQ
Which is bigger, Atmus Filtration Technologies or Dana?
Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.48B compared with $3.12B for Dana (DAN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ATMU or DAN?
DAN returned +56.11% over the past 12 months, compared with 0.00% for ATMU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Atmus Filtration Technologies or Dana?
Dana has the higher yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.52% for Atmus Filtration Technologies.
Are Atmus Filtration Technologies and Dana in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.