Autoliv (ALV) vs Garrett Motion (GTX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Garrett Motion (GTX) has outperformed Autoliv (ALV) over the past year, gaining 97.6% versus a loss of 9.8%. Over five years, GTX leads with a +260.1% price change compared with +14.8% for ALV. Autoliv is the larger company by market cap ($8.13 billion vs $4.80 billion), about 1.7 times the size.
On valuation, Autoliv trades at a lower forward P/E (9.5x vs 11.3x for Garrett Motion). Autoliv offers the higher dividend yield (3.12% vs 1.17%). Garrett Motion converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus 6.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ALV | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $111.03 | $25.75 |
| Market cap | $8.13B | $4.80B |
| 1-day change | +0.46% | -0.46% |
| YTD return | -6.46% | +47.73% |
| 1-year return | -9.75% | +97.62% |
| 5-year return | +14.78% | +260.14% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 13.09 | 14.23 |
| Forward P/E | 9.52 | 11.27 |
| EPS (TTM) | $8.48 | $1.81 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 1.17% |
| Annual dividend | $3.46 | $0.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $10.81B | $3.58B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.09% | +3.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $735.00M | $310.00M |
| Gross margin | 19.18% | 20.40% |
| Operating margin | 10.06% | — |
| Net margin | 6.80% | 8.65% |
| 52-week high | $132.17 | $36.25 |
| 52-week low | $99.16 | $12.26 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.99% | -28.97% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +20.97% | +39.81% |
| Average volume | 682.38K | 2.50M |
| Shares outstanding | 73.24M | 186.49M |
| Employees | 56,515 | 6,300 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Auto Parts:O.E.M. |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GTX has outperformed ALV by 107.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Autoliv offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.12% vs 1.17%).
About Autoliv
ALV stock →Autoliv, Inc., through its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, and supplies passive safety systems to the automotive industry in the Americas, Europe, China, and Asia. The company offers passive safety systems, such as modules and components for frontal-impact airbag protection systems, side-impact airbag protection systems, pedestrian protection systems, steering wheels, inflator technologies, battery cut-off switches, and seatbelts.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 56,515 employees
About Garrett Motion
GTX stock →Garrett Motion Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells turbocharging, air and fluid compression, and high-speed electric motor technologies to original equipment manufacturers and independent aftermarket distributors in the mobility and industrial fields.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 6,300 employees
ALV vs GTX FAQ
Which is bigger, Autoliv or Garrett Motion?
Autoliv (ALV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.13B compared with $4.80B for Garrett Motion (GTX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ALV or GTX?
GTX returned +97.62% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.75% for ALV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ALV or GTX?
ALV has the lower trailing P/E at 13.1, versus 14.2 for GTX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Autoliv or Garrett Motion?
Autoliv has the higher yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.17% for Garrett Motion.
Are Autoliv and Garrett Motion in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.