MetaCap

Garrett Motion (GTX) vs Visteon (VC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Garrett Motion (GTX) has outperformed Visteon (VC) over the past year, gaining 98.5% versus a loss of 26.3%. Over five years, GTX leads with a +261.8% price change compared with -21.3% for VC. Garrett Motion is the larger company by market cap ($4.83 billion vs $2.29 billion), about 2.1 times the size.

On valuation, Visteon trades at a lower forward P/E (8.2x vs 11.3x for Garrett Motion). Visteon offers the higher dividend yield (1.51% vs 1.16%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GTX+98.54%VC-26.29%
+188%+75%-39%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
GTX+253.90%VC-15.03%
+401%+173%-54%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GTX versus VC key metrics
MetricGTXVC
Share price$25.88$85.81
Market cap$4.83B$2.29B
1-day change+0.04%-1.47%
YTD return+48.42%-8.42%
1-year return+98.54%-26.29%
5-year return+261.82%-21.29%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.2215.69
Forward P/E11.338.20
EPS (TTM)$1.82$5.47
Dividend yield1.16%1.51%
Annual dividend$0.30$1.30
Revenue (latest FY)$3.58B—
Revenue growth (YoY)+3.14%—
Net income (latest FY)$310.00M—
Gross margin20.40%—
Net margin8.65%—
52-week high$36.25$126.95
52-week low$12.26$83.49
Distance from 52-week high-28.61%-32.41%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+39.10%+45.09%
Average volume2.50M467.07K
Shares outstanding186.49M26.70M
Employees6,30010,500
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryAuto Parts:O.E.M.Auto Parts:O.E.M.

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Garrett Motion is about 2.1 times larger than Visteon by market value ($4.83B vs $2.29B).
  • GTX has outperformed VC by 124.8 percentage points over the past year.

About Garrett Motion

GTX stock →

Garrett Motion Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells turbocharging, air and fluid compression, and high-speed electric motor technologies to original equipment manufacturers and independent aftermarket distributors in the mobility and industrial fields.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 6,300 employees

About Visteon

VC stock →

Visteon Corporation, an automotive technology company, engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of automotive electronics and connected car solutions for vehicle manufacturers. It provides instrument clusters, including analog gauge clusters for 2-D and 3-D display-based devices; information displays that integrate a range of user interface technologies and graphics management capabilities, such as active privacy, TrueColor enhancement, local dimming, cameras, optics, haptic feedback, and light effects; and infotainment and connected car solutions, including scalable Android infotainment for seamless connectivity, as well as onboard artificial intelligence-based voice assistants with natural language understanding.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 10,500 employees

GTX vs VC FAQ

Which is bigger, Garrett Motion or Visteon?

Garrett Motion (GTX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.83B compared with $2.29B for Visteon (VC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GTX or VC?

GTX returned +98.54% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.29% for VC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, GTX or VC?

GTX has the lower trailing P/E at 14.2, versus 15.7 for VC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Garrett Motion or Visteon?

Visteon has the higher yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.16% for Garrett Motion.

Are Garrett Motion and Visteon in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons