Garrett Motion (GTX) vs Lear (LEA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Garrett Motion (GTX) has outperformed Lear (LEA) over the past year, gaining 98.5% versus a gain of 20.4%. Over five years, GTX leads with a +261.8% price change compared with -33.2% for LEA. Lear is the larger company by market cap ($5.84 billion vs $4.83 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Garrett Motion is growing revenue faster (+3.1% vs -0.2%).
On valuation, Lear trades at a lower forward P/E (7.0x vs 11.3x for Garrett Motion). Lear offers the higher dividend yield (2.60% vs 1.16%). Garrett Motion converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus 1.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GTX | LEA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $25.88 | $118.39 |
| Market cap | $4.83B | $5.84B |
| 1-day change | +0.04% | -1.04% |
| YTD return | +48.42% | +4.39% |
| 1-year return | +98.54% | +20.36% |
| 5-year return | +261.82% | -33.19% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.22 | 11.02 |
| Forward P/E | 11.33 | 7.02 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.82 | $10.74 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 2.60% |
| Annual dividend | $0.30 | $3.08 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.58B | $23.26B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.14% | -0.20% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $310.00M | $436.80M |
| Gross margin | 20.40% | 6.47% |
| Operating margin | — | 3.34% |
| Net margin | 8.65% | 1.88% |
| 52-week high | $36.25 | $150.33 |
| 52-week low | $12.26 | $96.04 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -28.61% | -21.25% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +39.10% | +26.45% |
| Average volume | 2.50M | 639.11K |
| Shares outstanding | 186.49M | 49.32M |
| Employees | 6,300 | 164,300 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Auto Parts:O.E.M. |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GTX has outperformed LEA by 78.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Garrett Motion trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.2x vs 11.0x trailing P/E).
- Lear offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.60% vs 1.16%).
- Garrett Motion is more profitable, keeping 8.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.9 cents for Lear.
About Garrett Motion
GTX stock →Garrett Motion Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells turbocharging, air and fluid compression, and high-speed electric motor technologies to original equipment manufacturers and independent aftermarket distributors in the mobility and industrial fields.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 6,300 employees
About Lear
LEA stock →Lear Corporation designs, develops, engineers, manufactures, assembles, and supplies automotive seating, and electrical distribution systems and related components for automotive original equipment manufacturers in North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and South America. Its Seating segment offers seat systems, keyseat components, seat trim covers, seat mechanisms, thermal comfort systems such as seat heating, ventilation, active cooling, pneumatic lumbar and massage products, seat cushioning, and headrests, as well as surface materials, such as leather and fabric for light trucks, compact cars, pick-up trucks, and sport utility vehicles.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 164,300 employees
GTX vs LEA FAQ
Which is bigger, Garrett Motion or Lear?
Lear (LEA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.84B compared with $4.83B for Garrett Motion (GTX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GTX or LEA?
GTX returned +98.54% over the past 12 months, compared with +20.36% for LEA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GTX or LEA?
LEA has the lower trailing P/E at 11.0, versus 14.2 for GTX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Garrett Motion or Lear?
Lear has the higher yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.16% for Garrett Motion.
Are Garrett Motion and Lear in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.