MetaCap

A.O. Smith (AOS) vs Generac Holdlings (GNRC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 11, 2026.

Summary

Generac Holdlings (GNRC) has outperformed A.O. Smith (AOS) over the past year, gaining 32.3% versus a loss of 16.8%. Over five years, AOS leads with a -14.2% price change compared with -50.2% for GNRC. Generac Holdlings is the larger company by market cap ($13.29 billion vs $7.66 billion), about 1.7 times the size, while A.O. Smith is growing revenue faster (+0.3% vs -2.0%).

On valuation, A.O. Smith trades at a lower forward P/E (13.8x vs 17.3x for Generac Holdlings). A.O. Smith pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while Generac Holdlings does not currently pay one. A.O. Smith converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.3% versus 3.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AOS-16.78%GNRC+32.26%
+78%+27%-24%
Oct 10, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
AOS-12.22%GNRC-44.70%
+47%-19%-86%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AOS versus GNRC key metrics
MetricAOSGNRC
Share price$56.38$224.94
Market cap$7.66B$13.29B
1-day change-0.32%+0.24%
YTD return-15.70%+64.95%
1-year return-16.78%+32.26%
5-year return-14.19%-50.23%
P/E ratio (TTM)15.7051.71
Forward P/E13.8017.34
EPS (TTM)$3.59$4.35
Dividend yield2.52%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.42$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$3.83B$4.21B
Revenue growth (YoY)+0.32%-2.02%
Net income (latest FY)$546.20M$159.55M
Gross margin38.83%38.29%
Operating margin19.02%6.87%
Net margin14.26%3.79%
52-week high$81.87$296.44
52-week low$54.16$134.80
Distance from 52-week high-31.13%-24.12%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+24.00%+27.94%
Average volume1.54M1.22M
Shares outstanding110.05M59.06M
Employees11,5009,400
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryConsumer Electronics/AppliancesMetal Fabrications

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • GNRC has outperformed AOS by 49.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Generac Holdlings trades at a higher earnings multiple (51.7x vs 15.7x trailing P/E).
  • A.O. Smith offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.52% vs 0.00%).
  • A.O. Smith is more profitable, keeping 14.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.8 cents for Generac Holdlings.

About A.O. Smith

AOS stock →

A. O.

Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Electronics/Appliances · 11,500 employees

About Generac Holdlings

GNRC stock →

Generac Holdings Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes energy technology products and solutions worldwide.

Consumer Discretionary · Metal Fabrications · 9,400 employees

AOS vs GNRC FAQ

Which is bigger, A.O. Smith or Generac Holdlings?

Generac Holdlings (GNRC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $13.29B compared with $7.66B for A.O. Smith (AOS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AOS or GNRC?

GNRC returned +32.26% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.78% for AOS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AOS or GNRC?

AOS has the lower trailing P/E at 15.7, versus 51.7 for GNRC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, A.O. Smith or Generac Holdlings?

A.O. Smith pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while Generac Holdlings does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are A.O. Smith and Generac Holdlings in the same industry?

Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Consumer Electronics/Appliances for A.O. Smith and Metal Fabrications for Generac Holdlings.

More comparisons