MetaCap

Antero Resources (AR) vs EQT (EQT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Antero Resources (AR) has outperformed EQT (EQT) over the past year, gaining 4.9% versus a loss of 8.5%. Over five years, EQT leads with a +164.1% price change compared with +81.6% for AR. EQT is the larger company by market cap ($32.72 billion vs $10.94 billion), about 3.0 times the size.

On valuation, Antero Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (8.1x vs 13.9x for EQT). EQT pays a dividend yielding 1.25%, while Antero Resources does not currently pay one. EQT converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.6% versus 12.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AR+4.93%EQT-8.48%
+36%+9%-17%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AR+73.26%EQT+150.53%
+236%+101%-33%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AR versus EQT key metrics
MetricAREQT
Share price$35.57$52.31
Market cap$10.94B$32.72B
1-day change-0.42%-0.30%
YTD return+3.22%-2.41%
1-year return+4.93%-8.48%
5-year return+81.57%+164.06%
P/E ratio (TTM)10.2212.14
Forward P/E8.1113.87
EPS (TTM)$3.48$4.31
Dividend yield0.00%1.25%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.653
Revenue (latest FY)$5.28B$8.64B
Revenue growth (YoY)+21.97%+63.92%
Net income (latest FY)$674.57M$2.04B
Gross margin—82.28%
Operating margin16.75%37.59%
Net margin12.79%23.59%
52-week high$45.75$68.24
52-week low$29.10$47.94
Distance from 52-week high-22.25%-23.34%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+38.97%+28.45%
Average volume4.16M7.19M
Shares outstanding307.44M625.52M
Employees6321,523
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas ProductionOil & Gas Production

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • EQT is about 3.0 times larger than Antero Resources by market value ($32.72B vs $10.94B).
  • AR has outperformed EQT by 13.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • EQT offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.25% vs 0.00%).
  • EQT is more profitable, keeping 23.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 12.8 cents for Antero Resources.
  • EQT grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+63.92% vs +21.97%).

About Antero Resources

AR stock →

Antero Resources Corporation, an independent oil and natural gas company, engages in the development, production, exploration, and acquisition of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and oil properties in the United States. It operates in three segments: Exploration and Production; Marketing; and Equity Method Investment in Antero Midstream.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 632 employees

About EQT

EQT stock →

EQT Corporation engages in the exploration, production, gathering, and transmission of hydrocarbons and natural gas. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to marketers, utilities, and industrial customers located in the Appalachian Basin.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,523 employees

AR vs EQT FAQ

Which is bigger, Antero Resources or EQT?

EQT (EQT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.72B compared with $10.94B for Antero Resources (AR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AR or EQT?

AR returned +4.93% over the past 12 months, compared with -8.48% for EQT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AR or EQT?

AR has the lower trailing P/E at 10.2, versus 12.1 for EQT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Antero Resources or EQT?

EQT pays a dividend yielding 1.25%, while Antero Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Antero Resources and EQT in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons