Dana (DAN) vs Visteon (VC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Dana (DAN) has outperformed Visteon (VC) over the past year, gaining 50.4% versus a loss of 26.3%. Over five years, DAN leads with a +11.7% price change compared with -21.3% for VC. Dana is the larger company by market cap ($3.01 billion vs $2.32 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Dana trades at a lower forward P/E (6.7x vs 8.3x for Visteon). Dana offers the higher dividend yield (1.57% vs 1.49%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DAN | VC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $28.02 | $87.09 |
| Market cap | $3.01B | $2.32B |
| 1-day change | -1.44% | -2.49% |
| YTD return | +17.93% | -8.42% |
| 1-year return | +50.40% | -26.29% |
| 5-year return | +11.72% | -21.29% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 16.34 |
| Forward P/E | 6.69 | 8.32 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.36 | $5.33 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 1.49% |
| Annual dividend | $0.44 | $1.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.50B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.03% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $85.00M | — |
| Gross margin | 8.03% | — |
| Operating margin | 1.85% | — |
| Net margin | 1.13% | — |
| 52-week high | $39.56 | $126.95 |
| 52-week low | $17.74 | $83.49 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.17% | -31.40% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +38.01% | +42.96% |
| Average volume | 1.40M | 467.87K |
| Shares outstanding | 107.58M | 26.70M |
| Employees | 27,300 | 10,500 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Auto Parts:O.E.M. |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- DAN has outperformed VC by 76.7 percentage points over the past year.
About Dana
DAN stock →Dana Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries, provides power-conveyance and energy-management solutions for on-highway vehicles in North America, Europe, South America, and the Asia Pacific. The Light Vehicle segment provides axles, driveshafts, internal combustion engine (ICE), hybrid and electric transmissions, e-axle and e-transmission systems, inverters, electric motors, controllers, sealing and thermal products, e-sealing, e-thermal cooling systems, battery and electronics cooling, hydrogen fuel cell cooling, and new power industrial cooling.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 27,300 employees
About Visteon
VC stock →Visteon Corporation, an automotive technology company, engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of automotive electronics and connected car solutions for vehicle manufacturers. It provides instrument clusters, including analog gauge clusters for 2-D and 3-D display-based devices; information displays that integrate a range of user interface technologies and graphics management capabilities, such as active privacy, TrueColor enhancement, local dimming, cameras, optics, haptic feedback, and light effects; and infotainment and connected car solutions, including scalable Android infotainment for seamless connectivity, as well as onboard artificial intelligence-based voice assistants with natural language understanding.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 10,500 employees
DAN vs VC FAQ
Which is bigger, Dana or Visteon?
Dana (DAN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.01B compared with $2.32B for Visteon (VC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DAN or VC?
DAN returned +50.40% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.29% for VC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Dana or Visteon?
Dana has the higher yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.49% for Visteon.
Are Dana and Visteon in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.