MetaCap

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) vs Visteon (VC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) has outperformed Visteon (VC) over the past year, gaining 0.0% versus a loss of 26.3%. Atmus Filtration Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($3.48 billion vs $2.30 billion), about 1.5 times the size. On valuation, Visteon trades at a lower forward P/E (8.2x vs 13.0x for Atmus Filtration Technologies).

Visteon offers the higher dividend yield (1.51% vs 0.52%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ATMU0.00%VC-26.29%
+52%+10%-32%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ATMU+103.79%VC-36.99%
+211%+74%-63%
May 22, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ATMU versus VC key metrics
MetricATMUVC
Share price$42.62$86.15
Market cap$3.48B$2.30B
1-day change-3.40%-1.08%
YTD return-15.01%-8.42%
1-year return0.00%-26.29%
5-year return—-21.29%
P/E ratio (TTM)16.2715.75
Forward P/E13.018.23
EPS (TTM)$2.62$5.47
Dividend yield0.52%1.51%
Annual dividend$0.22$1.30
Revenue (latest FY)$1.76B—
Revenue growth (YoY)+5.67%—
Net income (latest FY)$207.40M—
Gross margin28.24%—
Operating margin16.95%—
Net margin11.76%—
52-week high$66.50$126.95
52-week low$40.76$83.49
Distance from 52-week high-35.91%-32.14%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+52.98%+44.52%
Average volume684.84K467.07K
Shares outstanding81.60M26.70M
Employees4,50010,500
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryAuto Parts:O.E.M.Auto Parts:O.E.M.

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ATMU has outperformed VC by 26.3 percentage points over the past year.

About Atmus Filtration Technologies

ATMU stock →

Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells filtration products under the Fleetguard brand in the United States and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 4,500 employees

About Visteon

VC stock →

Visteon Corporation, an automotive technology company, engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of automotive electronics and connected car solutions for vehicle manufacturers. It provides instrument clusters, including analog gauge clusters for 2-D and 3-D display-based devices; information displays that integrate a range of user interface technologies and graphics management capabilities, such as active privacy, TrueColor enhancement, local dimming, cameras, optics, haptic feedback, and light effects; and infotainment and connected car solutions, including scalable Android infotainment for seamless connectivity, as well as onboard artificial intelligence-based voice assistants with natural language understanding.

Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 10,500 employees

ATMU vs VC FAQ

Which is bigger, Atmus Filtration Technologies or Visteon?

Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.48B compared with $2.30B for Visteon (VC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ATMU or VC?

ATMU returned 0.00% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.29% for VC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ATMU or VC?

VC has the lower trailing P/E at 15.7, versus 16.3 for ATMU. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Atmus Filtration Technologies or Visteon?

Visteon has the higher yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.52% for Atmus Filtration Technologies.

Are Atmus Filtration Technologies and Visteon in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons