Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) vs Mobileye Global (MBLY)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) has outperformed Mobileye Global (MBLY) over the past year, gaining 0.0% versus a loss of 52.6%. Mobileye Global is the larger company by market cap ($5.97 billion vs $3.45 billion), about 1.7 times the size. On valuation, Atmus Filtration Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (12.9x vs 14.3x for Mobileye Global).
Atmus Filtration Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.52%, while Mobileye Global does not currently pay one. Atmus Filtration Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.8% versus -20.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ATMU | MBLY |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $42.34 | $7.02 |
| Market cap | $3.45B | $5.97B |
| 1-day change | -4.03% | -1.85% |
| YTD return | -15.01% | -31.51% |
| 1-year return | 0.00% | -52.62% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 16.16 | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.92 | 14.30 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.62 | $-4.97 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.22 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.76B | $1.89B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.67% | +14.51% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $207.40M | $-392.00M |
| Gross margin | 28.24% | 47.73% |
| Operating margin | 16.95% | -23.23% |
| Net margin | 11.76% | -20.70% |
| 52-week high | $66.50 | $15.81 |
| 52-week low | $42.25 | $6.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -36.33% | -55.61% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +53.99% | +61.87% |
| Average volume | 684.84K | 5.84M |
| Shares outstanding | 81.60M | 252.42M |
| Employees | 4,500 | 4,200 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Technology |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ATMU has outperformed MBLY by 52.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Atmus Filtration Technologies is more profitable, keeping 11.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -20.7 cents for Mobileye Global.
- Mobileye Global grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+14.51% vs +5.67%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Atmus Filtration Technologies in Consumer Discretionary and Mobileye Global in Technology.
About Atmus Filtration Technologies
ATMU stock →Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells filtration products under the Fleetguard brand in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 4,500 employees
About Mobileye Global
MBLY stock →Mobileye Global Inc. develops and deploys advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving technologies and solutions in the United States, Europe, China, and internationally.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 4,200 employees
ATMU vs MBLY FAQ
Which is bigger, Atmus Filtration Technologies or Mobileye Global?
Mobileye Global (MBLY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.97B compared with $3.45B for Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ATMU or MBLY?
ATMU returned 0.00% over the past 12 months, compared with -52.62% for MBLY (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Atmus Filtration Technologies or Mobileye Global?
Atmus Filtration Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.52%, while Mobileye Global does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Atmus Filtration Technologies and Mobileye Global in the same industry?
No. Atmus Filtration Technologies is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Mobileye Global is in Technology.