Belden (BDC) vs Ericsson (ERIC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Ericsson (ERIC) has outperformed Belden (BDC) over the past year, gaining 12.2% versus a loss of 5.2%. Over five years, BDC leads with a +80.6% price change compared with -22.3% for ERIC. Ericsson is the larger company by market cap ($30.78 billion vs $4.28 billion), about 7.2 times the size.
On valuation, Belden trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 15.5x for Ericsson). Belden pays a dividend yielding 0.18%, while Ericsson does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BDC | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $109.41 | $9.46 |
| Market cap | $4.28B | $30.78B |
| 1-day change | -3.36% | +0.32% |
| YTD return | -6.13% | -1.97% |
| 1-year return | -5.20% | +12.22% |
| 5-year return | +80.57% | -22.33% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.79 | 11.97 |
| Forward P/E | 10.90 | 15.45 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.15 | $0.79 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 3.37% |
| Annual dividend | $0.20 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.72B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.33% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $237.52M | — |
| Gross margin | 37.98% | — |
| Operating margin | 11.63% | — |
| Net margin | 8.75% | — |
| 52-week high | $159.99 | $13.77 |
| 52-week low | $98.00 | $8.12 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.61% | -31.30% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | underperform |
| Avg. price target upside | +40.02% | -1.37% |
| Average volume | 452.11K | 10.85M |
| Shares outstanding | 39.08M | 2.99B |
| Employees | 8,000 | 86,536 |
| Sector | Industrials | Technology |
| Industry | Telecommunications Equipment | Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Ericsson is about 7.2 times larger than Belden by market value ($30.78B vs $4.28B).
- ERIC has outperformed BDC by 17.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Belden trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.8x vs 12.0x trailing P/E).
- Ericsson offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 0.18%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Belden in Industrials and Ericsson in Technology.
About Belden
BDC stock →Belden Inc. provides connection solutions to bring data infrastructure into alignment to unlock new possibilities for its customers.
Industrials · Telecommunications Equipment · 8,000 employees
About Ericsson
ERIC stock →Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), together with its subsidiaries, provides mobile connectivity solutions to communications service providers, enterprises, and the public sector in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania, and India. It operates through Networks; Cloud Software and Services; Enterprise; and Other segments.
Technology · Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment · 86,536 employees
BDC vs ERIC FAQ
Which is bigger, Belden or Ericsson?
Ericsson (ERIC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $30.78B compared with $4.28B for Belden (BDC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BDC or ERIC?
ERIC returned +12.22% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.20% for BDC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BDC or ERIC?
ERIC has the lower trailing P/E at 12.0, versus 17.8 for BDC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Belden or Ericsson?
Ericsson has the higher yield at 3.37%, compared with 0.18% for Belden.
Are Belden and Ericsson in the same industry?
No. Belden is in the Industrials sector, while Ericsson is in Technology.