Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP) vs Viking (VIK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Viking (VIK) has outperformed Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP) over the past year, gaining 36.6% versus a gain of 8.1%. Viking is the larger company by market cap ($36.01 billion vs $29.11 billion), about 1.2 times the size. On valuation, Viking trades at a lower forward P/E (18.4x vs 25.3x for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays a dividend yielding 4.82%, while Viking does not currently pay one. Viking converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 17.7% versus 11.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BIP | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $36.76 | $80.63 |
| Market cap | $29.11B | $36.01B |
| 1-day change | -1.84% | -0.78% |
| YTD return | +7.74% | +13.79% |
| 1-year return | +8.12% | +36.57% |
| 5-year return | -2.29% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 59.29 | 26.79 |
| Forward P/E | 25.32 | 18.39 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.62 | $3.01 |
| Dividend yield | 4.82% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.77 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $23.10B | $6.50B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.80% | +21.89% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.53B | $1.15B |
| Gross margin | 26.94% | 43.34% |
| Operating margin | 25.10% | 23.10% |
| Net margin | 10.96% | 17.65% |
| 52-week high | $44.04 | $110.09 |
| 52-week low | $33.21 | $56.37 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.53% | -26.76% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +28.13% | +35.87% |
| Average volume | 906.11K | 3.45M |
| Shares outstanding | 457.71M | 318.87M |
| Employees | — | 13,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Marine Transportation | Marine Transportation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- VIK has outperformed BIP by 28.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Brookfield Infrastructure Partners trades at a higher earnings multiple (59.3x vs 26.8x trailing P/E).
- Brookfield Infrastructure Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.82% vs 0.00%).
- Viking is more profitable, keeping 17.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 11.0 cents for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners.
- Viking grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+21.89% vs +9.80%).
About Brookfield Infrastructure Partners
BIP stock →Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. engages in the utilities, transport, midstream, and data businesses.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation
About Viking
VIK stock →Viking Holdings Ltd focused on providing passenger cruises in North America, the United Kingdom, and internationally. It operates through the River and Ocean segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 13,000 employees
BIP vs VIK FAQ
Which is bigger, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners or Viking?
Viking (VIK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $36.01B compared with $29.11B for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BIP or VIK?
VIK returned +36.57% over the past 12 months, compared with +8.12% for BIP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BIP or VIK?
VIK has the lower trailing P/E at 26.8, versus 59.3 for BIP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners or Viking?
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays a dividend yielding 4.82%, while Viking does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and Viking in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.