Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) vs Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) has outperformed Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) over the past year, gaining 10.0% versus a gain of 8.7%. Over five years, BSM leads with a +19.8% price change compared with -0.1% for KRP. Black Stone Minerals L.P. is the larger company by market cap ($3.11 billion vs $1.92 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Black Stone Minerals L.P. trades at a lower forward P/E (13.0x vs 14.4x for Kimbell Royalty Partners). Kimbell Royalty Partners offers the higher dividend yield (10.72% vs 8.34%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BSM | KRP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.62 | $14.92 |
| Market cap | $3.11B | $1.92B |
| 1-day change | -0.41% | -0.13% |
| YTD return | +10.46% | +27.04% |
| 1-year return | +8.66% | +10.01% |
| 5-year return | +19.84% | -0.13% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.18 | 17.55 |
| Forward P/E | 13.00 | 14.44 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.20 | $0.85 |
| Dividend yield | 8.34% | 10.72% |
| Annual dividend | $1.22 | $1.60 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $469.92M | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.35% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $299.93M | — |
| Operating margin | 65.63% | — |
| Net margin | 63.83% | — |
| 52-week high | $15.49 | $15.80 |
| 52-week low | $12.32 | $11.31 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.62% | -5.57% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +9.44% | +28.69% |
| Average volume | 375.85K | 888.53K |
| Shares outstanding | 212.71M | 100.90M |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Kimbell Royalty Partners trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.6x vs 12.2x trailing P/E).
- Kimbell Royalty Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.72% vs 8.34%).
About Black Stone Minerals L.P.
BSM stock →Black Stone Minerals, L.P., together with its subsidiaries, owns and manages oil and natural gas mineral interests. It owns mineral interests in approximately 16.9 million gross acres, nonparticipating royalty interests in 1.8 million gross acres, and overriding royalty interests in 1.6 million gross acres located in 41 states in the United States.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P
About Kimbell Royalty Partners
KRP stock →Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP, together with its subsidiaries, owns and acquires mineral and royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Fort Worth, Texas.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P
BSM vs KRP FAQ
Which is bigger, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Kimbell Royalty Partners?
Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.11B compared with $1.92B for Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BSM or KRP?
KRP returned +10.01% over the past 12 months, compared with +8.66% for BSM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BSM or KRP?
BSM has the lower trailing P/E at 12.2, versus 17.6 for KRP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Kimbell Royalty Partners?
Kimbell Royalty Partners has the higher yield at 10.72%, compared with 8.34% for Black Stone Minerals L.P..
Are Black Stone Minerals L.P. and Kimbell Royalty Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector.