Peabody Energy (BTU) vs Ramaco Resources (METC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Peabody Energy (BTU) has outperformed Ramaco Resources (METC) over the past year, losing 23.3% versus a loss of 79.5%. Over five years, BTU leads with a +55.7% price change compared with -44.5% for METC. Peabody Energy is the larger company by market cap ($3.05 billion vs $540.7 million), about 5.6 times the size.
On valuation, Peabody Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (8.8x vs 28.9x for Ramaco Resources). Peabody Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.20%, while Ramaco Resources does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BTU | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $25.00 | $8.49 |
| Market cap | $3.05B | $540.67M |
| 1-day change | +0.60% | +3.16% |
| YTD return | -16.33% | -52.83% |
| 1-year return | -23.30% | -79.54% |
| 5-year return | +55.70% | -44.51% |
| Forward P/E | 8.76 | 28.94 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.49 | $-1.03 |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.30 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.86B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -8.86% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-42.50M | — |
| Operating margin | -2.07% | — |
| Net margin | -1.10% | — |
| 52-week high | $41.14 | $57.80 |
| 52-week low | $20.06 | $7.77 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -39.23% | -85.31% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.32% | +118.02% |
| Average volume | 2.34M | 2.06M |
| Shares outstanding | 121.90M | 51.88M |
| Employees | 5,400 | 900 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Coal Mining | Coal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Peabody Energy is about 5.6 times larger than Ramaco Resources by market value ($3.05B vs $540.67M).
- BTU has outperformed METC by 56.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Peabody Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.20% vs 0.00%).
About Peabody Energy
BTU stock →Peabody Energy Corporation engages in the production of metallurgical and thermal coal. It operates through Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin, and Other U.S.
Energy · Coal Mining · 5,400 employees
About Ramaco Resources
METC stock →Ramaco Resources, Inc. engages in the development, operation, and sale of metallurgical coal.
Energy · Coal Mining · 900 employees
BTU vs METC FAQ
Which is bigger, Peabody Energy or Ramaco Resources?
Peabody Energy (BTU) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.05B compared with $540.67M for Ramaco Resources (METC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BTU or METC?
BTU returned -23.30% over the past 12 months, compared with -79.54% for METC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Peabody Energy or Ramaco Resources?
Peabody Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.20%, while Ramaco Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Peabody Energy and Ramaco Resources in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Coal Mining industry within the Energy sector.