Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) vs Peabody Energy (BTU)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) has outperformed Peabody Energy (BTU) over the past year, gaining 2.7% versus a loss of 21.2%. Over five years, AMR leads with a +181.8% price change compared with +56.6% for BTU. Peabody Energy is the larger company by market cap ($3.05 billion vs $2.21 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Peabody Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (8.8x vs 9.5x for Alpha Metallurgical Resources). Peabody Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.20%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AMR | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $174.28 | $25.00 |
| Market cap | $2.21B | $3.05B |
| 1-day change | +2.39% | +0.60% |
| YTD return | -12.81% | -15.82% |
| 1-year return | +2.67% | -21.24% |
| 5-year return | +181.78% | +56.64% |
| Forward P/E | 9.55 | 8.76 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-3.59 | $-1.49 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $3.86B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -8.86% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $-42.50M |
| Operating margin | — | -2.07% |
| Net margin | — | -1.10% |
| 52-week high | $253.82 | $41.14 |
| 52-week low | $133.64 | $20.06 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.34% | -39.23% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.11% | +26.32% |
| Average volume | 318.40K | 2.34M |
| Shares outstanding | 12.68M | 121.90M |
| Employees | 3,950 | 5,400 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Energy |
| Industry | Coking Coal | Coal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AMR has outperformed BTU by 23.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Peabody Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.20% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Alpha Metallurgical Resources in Basic Materials and Peabody Energy in Energy.
About Alpha Metallurgical Resources
AMR stock →Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc., a mining company, produces, processes, and sells met and thermal coal in Virginia and West Virginia. The company provides metallurgical coal products.
Basic Materials · Coking Coal · 3,950 employees
About Peabody Energy
BTU stock →Peabody Energy Corporation engages in the production of metallurgical and thermal coal. It operates through Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin, and Other U.S.
Energy · Coal Mining · 5,400 employees
AMR vs BTU FAQ
Which is bigger, Alpha Metallurgical Resources or Peabody Energy?
Peabody Energy (BTU) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.05B compared with $2.21B for Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AMR or BTU?
AMR returned +2.67% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.24% for BTU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Alpha Metallurgical Resources or Peabody Energy?
Peabody Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.20%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Alpha Metallurgical Resources and Peabody Energy in the same industry?
No. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is in the Basic Materials sector, while Peabody Energy is in Energy.