Alliance Resource Partners L.P. (ARLP) vs Peabody Energy (BTU)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Alliance Resource Partners L.P. (ARLP) has outperformed Peabody Energy (BTU) over the past year, losing 2.4% versus a loss of 21.2%. Over five years, ARLP leads with a +110.0% price change compared with +56.6% for BTU. Alliance Resource Partners L.P. is the larger company by market cap ($3.17 billion vs $3.05 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Peabody Energy is growing revenue faster (-8.9% vs -10.4%).
On valuation, Alliance Resource Partners L.P. trades at a lower forward P/E (8.5x vs 8.8x for Peabody Energy). Alliance Resource Partners L.P. offers the higher dividend yield (9.74% vs 1.20%). Alliance Resource Partners L.P. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.2% versus -1.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ARLP | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $24.65 | $25.00 |
| Market cap | $3.17B | $3.05B |
| 1-day change | +0.20% | +0.60% |
| YTD return | +6.11% | -15.82% |
| 1-year return | -2.41% | -21.24% |
| 5-year return | +109.97% | +56.64% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.02 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.47 | 8.76 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.05 | $-1.49 |
| Dividend yield | 9.74% | 1.20% |
| Annual dividend | $2.40 | $0.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.19B | $3.86B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10.37% | -8.86% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $311.16M | $-42.50M |
| Operating margin | 17.56% | -2.07% |
| Net margin | 14.18% | -1.10% |
| 52-week high | $29.45 | $41.14 |
| 52-week low | $23.00 | $20.06 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.30% | -39.23% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.45% | +26.32% |
| Average volume | 295.70K | 2.34M |
| Shares outstanding | 128.66M | 121.90M |
| Employees | 3,575 | 5,400 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Coal Mining | Coal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ARLP has outperformed BTU by 18.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Alliance Resource Partners L.P. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.74% vs 1.20%).
- Alliance Resource Partners L.P. is more profitable, keeping 14.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.1 cents for Peabody Energy.
About Alliance Resource Partners L.P.
ARLP stock →Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., a diversified natural resource company, engages in the production and marketing of coal to utilities and industrial users in the United States. The company operates through four segments: Illinois Basin Coal Operations, Appalachia Coal Operations, Oil & Gas Royalties, and Coal Royalties.
Energy · Coal Mining · 3,575 employees
About Peabody Energy
BTU stock →Peabody Energy Corporation engages in the production of metallurgical and thermal coal. It operates through Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin, and Other U.S.
Energy · Coal Mining · 5,400 employees
ARLP vs BTU FAQ
Which is bigger, Alliance Resource Partners L.P. or Peabody Energy?
Alliance Resource Partners L.P. (ARLP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.17B compared with $3.05B for Peabody Energy (BTU).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ARLP or BTU?
ARLP returned -2.41% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.24% for BTU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Alliance Resource Partners L.P. or Peabody Energy?
Alliance Resource Partners L.P. has the higher yield at 9.74%, compared with 1.20% for Peabody Energy.
Are Alliance Resource Partners L.P. and Peabody Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Coal Mining industry within the Energy sector.