MetaCap

Maplebear (CART) vs RB Global (RBA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Maplebear (CART) has outperformed RB Global (RBA) over the past year, gaining 16.0% versus a loss of 24.0%. RB Global is the larger company by market cap ($15.56 billion vs $10.99 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Maplebear is growing revenue faster (+10.8% vs +7.2%). On valuation, Maplebear trades at a lower forward P/E (9.5x vs 17.3x for RB Global).

RB Global pays a dividend yielding 1.50%, while Maplebear does not currently pay one. Maplebear converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.9% versus 9.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CART+15.95%RBA-23.98%
+36%+4%-27%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CART+50.70%RBA+27.88%
+95%+32%-31%
Sep 18, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CART versus RBA key metrics
MetricCARTRBA
Share price$46.30$84.03
Market cap$10.99B$15.56B
1-day change+2.41%+4.51%
YTD return+0.51%-21.84%
1-year return+15.95%-23.98%
5-year return—+20.72%
P/E ratio (TTM)25.3036.22
Forward P/E9.4517.27
EPS (TTM)$1.83$2.32
Dividend yield0.00%1.50%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.26
Revenue (latest FY)$3.74B$4.59B
Revenue growth (YoY)+10.78%+7.15%
Net income (latest FY)$447.00M$428.40M
Gross margin73.70%—
Operating margin13.31%15.54%
Net margin11.95%9.33%
52-week high$52.68$119.33
52-week low$32.73$78.05
Distance from 52-week high-12.11%-29.58%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+25.72%+53.09%
Average volume4.03M1.68M
Shares outstanding237.33M185.20M
Employees3,6008,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryBusiness ServicesBusiness Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CART has outperformed RBA by 39.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • RB Global trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.2x vs 25.3x trailing P/E).
  • RB Global offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.50% vs 0.00%).

About Maplebear

CART stock →

Maplebear Inc., doing business as Instacart, operates as a technology and enablement partner for the grocery industry in the United States and internationally. The company offers Instacart Marketplace which helps retailers serve customers' needs by supporting fulfillment options, shopping occasions, and categories; Instacart Enterprise platform, an end-to-end technology solution for retailers across all aspects of business; and Instacart Ads, enables brands to learn more about general consumer behavior from discovery to purchase, offering insights about how to optimize advertising spend.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 3,600 employees

About RB Global

RBA stock →

RB Global, Inc. operates a marketplace that provides insights, services, and transaction solutions for buyers and sellers of commercial assets and vehicles worldwide.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 8,000 employees

CART vs RBA FAQ

Which is bigger, Maplebear or RB Global?

RB Global (RBA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $15.56B compared with $10.99B for Maplebear (CART).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CART or RBA?

CART returned +15.95% over the past 12 months, compared with -23.98% for RBA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CART or RBA?

CART has the lower trailing P/E at 25.3, versus 36.2 for RBA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Maplebear or RB Global?

RB Global pays a dividend yielding 1.50%, while Maplebear does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Maplebear and RB Global in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons