Fair Isaac (FICO) vs RB Global (RBA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
RB Global (RBA) has outperformed Fair Isaac (FICO) over the past year, losing 24.0% versus a loss of 63.7%. Over five years, FICO leads with a +66.4% price change compared with +20.7% for RBA. RB Global is the larger company by market cap ($14.89 billion vs $14.72 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Fair Isaac is growing revenue faster (+15.9% vs +7.2%).
On valuation, Fair Isaac trades at a lower forward P/E (13.6x vs 16.5x for RB Global). RB Global pays a dividend yielding 1.57%, while Fair Isaac does not currently pay one. Fair Isaac converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 32.7% versus 9.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FICO | RBA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $681.77 | $80.40 |
| Market cap | $14.72B | $14.89B |
| 1-day change | -1.97% | -0.80% |
| YTD return | -59.67% | -21.84% |
| 1-year return | -63.73% | -23.98% |
| 5-year return | +66.37% | +20.72% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.74 | 34.66 |
| Forward P/E | 13.58 | 16.52 |
| EPS (TTM) | $34.54 | $2.32 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.57% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.26 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.99B | $4.59B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +15.91% | +7.15% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $651.95M | $428.40M |
| Gross margin | 82.23% | — |
| Operating margin | 46.45% | 15.54% |
| Net margin | 32.75% | 9.33% |
| 52-week high | $1,858.91 | $119.33 |
| 52-week low | $586.05 | $78.05 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -63.32% | -32.62% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +63.94% | +60.00% |
| Average volume | 547.51K | 1.68M |
| Shares outstanding | 21.60M | 185.20M |
| Employees | 3,876 | 8,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RBA has outperformed FICO by 39.7 percentage points over the past year.
- RB Global trades at a higher earnings multiple (34.7x vs 19.7x trailing P/E).
- RB Global offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.57% vs 0.00%).
- Fair Isaac is more profitable, keeping 32.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 9.3 cents for RB Global.
- Fair Isaac grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+15.91% vs +7.15%).
About Fair Isaac
FICO stock →Fair Isaac Corporation provides analytics software in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through two segments, Scores and Software.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 3,876 employees
About RB Global
RBA stock →RB Global, Inc. operates a marketplace that provides insights, services, and transaction solutions for buyers and sellers of commercial assets and vehicles worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 8,000 employees
FICO vs RBA FAQ
Which is bigger, Fair Isaac or RB Global?
RB Global (RBA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.89B compared with $14.72B for Fair Isaac (FICO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FICO or RBA?
RBA returned -23.98% over the past 12 months, compared with -63.73% for FICO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FICO or RBA?
FICO has the lower trailing P/E at 19.7, versus 34.7 for RBA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fair Isaac or RB Global?
RB Global pays a dividend yielding 1.57%, while Fair Isaac does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fair Isaac and RB Global in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.