Celsius (CELH) vs Constellation Brands (STZ)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Constellation Brands (STZ) has outperformed Celsius (CELH) over the past year, losing 15.5% versus a loss of 55.9%. Over five years, CELH leads with a -9.2% price change compared with -45.9% for STZ. Constellation Brands is the larger company by market cap ($21.09 billion vs $6.94 billion), about 3.0 times the size, while Celsius is growing revenue faster (+85.5% vs -10.5%).
On valuation, Constellation Brands trades at a lower forward P/E (10.1x vs 15.9x for Celsius). Constellation Brands pays a dividend yielding 3.32%, while Celsius does not currently pay one. Constellation Brands converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.5% versus 4.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CELH | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $27.45 | $123.48 |
| Market cap | $6.94B | $21.09B |
| 1-day change | +1.95% | +4.30% |
| YTD return | -41.15% | -14.19% |
| 1-year return | -55.91% | -15.52% |
| 5-year return | -9.17% | -45.93% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 119.33 | 11.05 |
| Forward P/E | 15.89 | 10.07 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.23 | $11.17 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.32% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $4.10 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.52B | $9.14B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +85.54% | -10.48% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $108.00M | $1.69B |
| Gross margin | 50.39% | 51.55% |
| Operating margin | 5.61% | 29.78% |
| Net margin | 4.29% | 18.46% |
| 52-week high | $66.74 | $168.60 |
| 52-week low | $23.56 | $110.60 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -58.88% | -26.76% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +53.73% | +30.36% |
| Average volume | 9.18M | 2.14M |
| Shares outstanding | 253.04M | 170.75M |
| Employees | 1,497 | 9,400 |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Beverages (Production/Distribution) | Beverages (Production/Distribution) |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Constellation Brands is about 3.0 times larger than Celsius by market value ($21.09B vs $6.94B).
- STZ has outperformed CELH by 40.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Celsius trades at a higher earnings multiple (119.3x vs 11.1x trailing P/E).
- Constellation Brands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.32% vs 0.00%).
- Constellation Brands is more profitable, keeping 18.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 4.3 cents for Celsius.
- Celsius grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+85.54% vs -10.48%).
About Celsius
CELH stock →Celsius Holdings, Inc. develops, processes, manufactures, markets, sells, and distributes functional energy drinks in the United States, North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific, and internationally.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 1,497 employees
About Constellation Brands
STZ stock →Constellation Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, produces, imports, markets, and sells beer, wine, and spirits in the United States, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, and Italy. It offers beer under the Corona Extra, Corona Familiar, Corona Sunbrew, Corona Light, Corona Non-Alcoholic, Corona Premier, Modelo Especial, Modelo Chelada, Modelo Negra, Modelo Spiked Aguas Frescas, Modelo Oro, Modelo Noche Especial, Victoria, Vicky Chamoy, and Pacifico brand names.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 9,400 employees
CELH vs STZ FAQ
Which is bigger, Celsius or Constellation Brands?
Constellation Brands (STZ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $21.09B compared with $6.94B for Celsius (CELH).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CELH or STZ?
STZ returned -15.52% over the past 12 months, compared with -55.91% for CELH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CELH or STZ?
STZ has the lower trailing P/E at 11.1, versus 119.3 for CELH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Celsius or Constellation Brands?
Constellation Brands pays a dividend yielding 3.32%, while Celsius does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Celsius and Constellation Brands in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Beverages (Production/Distribution) industry within the Consumer Staples sector.