ChronoScale (CHRN) vs Kennametal (KMT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
ChronoScale (CHRN) has outperformed Kennametal (KMT) over the past year, gaining 263.2% versus a gain of 47.3%. Over five years, KMT leads with a -13.9% price change compared with -69.2% for CHRN. ChronoScale is the larger company by market cap ($2.77 billion vs $2.42 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
Kennametal pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while ChronoScale does not currently pay one. Kennametal converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.5% versus -70.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHRN | KMT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $19.03 | $31.71 |
| Market cap | $2.77B | $2.42B |
| 1-day change | -3.74% | -1.74% |
| YTD return | +120.25% | +11.62% |
| 1-year return | +263.17% | +47.28% |
| 5-year return | -69.21% | -13.95% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 7.17 |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.85 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.35 | $4.42 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.52% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.80 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $71.60M | $2.36B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +459.45% | +19.82% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-50.32M | $342.39M |
| Gross margin | -23.86% | 41.16% |
| Operating margin | -52.37% | 20.05% |
| Net margin | -70.28% | 14.53% |
| 52-week high | $30.00 | $43.81 |
| 52-week low | $3.50 | $20.38 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -36.57% | -27.62% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | underperform |
| Avg. price target upside | +68.16% | +2.27% |
| Average volume | 185.38K | 1.41M |
| Shares outstanding | 145.64M | 76.39M |
| Employees | 84 | 8,050 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CHRN has outperformed KMT by 215.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Kennametal offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.52% vs 0.00%).
- Kennametal is more profitable, keeping 14.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -70.3 cents for ChronoScale.
- ChronoScale grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+459.45% vs +19.82%).
About ChronoScale
CHRN stock →ChronoScale Holdings Corporation designs and develops a compute platform to support artificial intelligence (AI) workloads in the United States. The company focuses on large-scale deployments and provides dedicated compute environments engineered for performance, consistency, and long-term operational execution.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 84 employees
About Kennametal
KMT stock →Kennametal Inc. engages in development and application of tungsten carbides, ceramics, and hard materials and solutions worldwide.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 8,050 employees
CHRN vs KMT FAQ
Which is bigger, ChronoScale or Kennametal?
ChronoScale (CHRN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.77B compared with $2.42B for Kennametal (KMT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHRN or KMT?
CHRN returned +263.17% over the past 12 months, compared with +47.28% for KMT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, ChronoScale or Kennametal?
Kennametal pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while ChronoScale does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are ChronoScale and Kennametal in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.