MetaCap

Imax (IMAX) vs Kennametal (KMT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Imax (IMAX) has outperformed Kennametal (KMT) over the past year, gaining 59.2% versus a gain of 47.3%. Over five years, IMAX leads with a +151.2% price change compared with -12.4% for KMT. Imax is the larger company by market cap ($2.81 billion vs $2.42 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Kennametal is growing revenue faster (+19.8% vs +16.5%).

On valuation, Kennametal trades at a lower forward P/E (12.8x vs 23.8x for Imax). Kennametal pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while Imax does not currently pay one. Kennametal converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.5% versus 8.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

IMAX+59.25%KMT+47.28%
+106%+48%-10%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
IMAX+141.12%KMT-7.27%
+174%+58%-57%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

IMAX versus KMT key metrics
MetricIMAXKMT
Share price$51.31$31.71
Market cap$2.81B$2.42B
1-day change-0.27%-1.74%
YTD return+38.83%+11.62%
1-year return+59.25%+47.28%
5-year return+151.15%-12.43%
P/E ratio (TTM)70.297.17
Forward P/E23.8012.85
EPS (TTM)$0.73$4.42
Dividend yield0.00%2.52%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.80
Revenue (latest FY)$410.21M$2.36B
Revenue growth (YoY)+16.47%+19.82%
Net income (latest FY)$34.88M$342.39M
Gross margin60.02%41.16%
Operating margin20.53%20.05%
Net margin8.50%14.53%
52-week high$57.73$43.81
52-week low$30.74$20.38
Distance from 52-week high-11.12%-27.62%
Analyst consensusbuyunderperform
Avg. price target upside+9.78%+2.27%
Average volume1.27M1.41M
Shares outstanding54.84M76.39M
Employees6798,050
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • IMAX has outperformed KMT by 12.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Imax trades at a higher earnings multiple (70.3x vs 7.2x trailing P/E).
  • Kennametal offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.52% vs 0.00%).
  • Kennametal is more profitable, keeping 14.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 8.5 cents for Imax.
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Imax in Consumer Discretionary and Kennametal in Industrials.

About Imax

IMAX stock →

IMAX Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a technology platform for entertainment and events in the United States, Canada, Greater China, rest of Asia, Western Europe, Latin America, and internationally. It operates through Content Solutions; and Technology Products and Services segments.

Consumer Discretionary · Industrial Machinery/Components · 679 employees

About Kennametal

KMT stock →

Kennametal Inc. engages in development and application of tungsten carbides, ceramics, and hard materials and solutions worldwide.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 8,050 employees

IMAX vs KMT FAQ

Which is bigger, Imax or Kennametal?

Imax (IMAX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.81B compared with $2.42B for Kennametal (KMT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, IMAX or KMT?

IMAX returned +59.25% over the past 12 months, compared with +47.28% for KMT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, IMAX or KMT?

KMT has the lower trailing P/E at 7.2, versus 70.3 for IMAX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Imax or Kennametal?

Kennametal pays a dividend yielding 2.52%, while Imax does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Imax and Kennametal in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons