MetaCap

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) vs UBS Asset Management Income Fund (CIK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.8x vs 76.7x for UBS Asset Management Income Fund). UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (11.52% vs 7.45%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CHW-0.98%CIK-1.29%
+0%-1%-1%
Oct 7, 20261 yearOct 8, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CHW versus CIK key metrics
MetricCHWCIK
Share price$8.05$2.30
1-day change-0.98%-1.29%
P/E ratio (TTM)2.8276.67
EPS (TTM)$2.85$0.03
Dividend yield7.45%11.52%
Annual dividend$0.60$0.265
52-week high$9.18$2.98
52-week low$6.98$2.30
Distance from 52-week high-12.31%-22.82%
Average volume195.13K484.73K
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersFinance/Investors Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • UBS Asset Management Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (76.7x vs 2.8x trailing P/E).
  • UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (11.52% vs 7.45%).

About Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund

CHW stock →

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund is a closed ended balanced mutual fund launched by Calamos Investments LLC. The fund is managed by Calamos Advisors LLC.

Finance · Investment Managers

About UBS Asset Management Income Fund

CIK stock →

UBS Asset Management Income Fund, Inc. is a closed-ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC.

Finance · Finance/Investors Services

CHW vs CIK FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHW or CIK?

CHW has the lower trailing P/E at 2.8, versus 76.7 for CIK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund or UBS Asset Management Income Fund?

UBS Asset Management Income Fund has the higher yield at 11.52%, compared with 7.45% for Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund.

Are Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and UBS Asset Management Income Fund in the same industry?

Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Investment Managers for Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and Finance/Investors Services for UBS Asset Management Income Fund.

More comparisons